From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 99 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e3addf2ad --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012987.html @@ -0,0 +1,99 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic

+ Anssi Hannula + anssi at mageia.org +
+ Mon Mar 12 18:19:39 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
11.03.2012 19:28, Colin Guthrie kirjoitti:
+> However, I do feel we need to be more generally open to freeze pushes.
+> The justification in this case, IMO, was sufficient and in line with the
+> previous interpretations of policy we have expected in the past, but I
+> completely respect misc if he still disagrees.
+
+I also believe we should be more open to pushes for packages like
+xonotic, i.e. "unimportant" leaf packages, since having the new version
+for software like xonotic is generally more important than having zero
+regressions (which are in any case limited to xonotic only, and can be
+fixed later).
+
+Line would have to be drawn somewhere, though (otherwise it would become
+a mess, I guess), and I'm really not sure right now where it should
+exactly be then....
+
+
+This is just my opinion, not based on any previous discussion.
+
+-- 
+Anssi Hannula
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1