From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 188 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8d5211167 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/012943.html @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] [Freeze] please let in xonotic

+ Colin Guthrie + mageia at colin.guthr.ie +
+ Sun Mar 11 18:28:21 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
'Twas brillig, and Florian Hubold at 11/03/12 17:12 did gyre and gimble:
+> Am 11.03.2012 17:58, schrieb Samuel Verschelde:
+>> Le dimanche 11 mars 2012 13:21:57, Michael Scherer a écrit :
+>>> Le samedi 10 mars 2012 à 10:26 +0100, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
+>>>> Hi
+>>>>
+>>>> please let in xonotic-0.6.0
+>>>> It's just a game that impacts nothing else.
+>>> Niet.
+>>>
+>>> That's bugfix or security fixes.
+>> Communication tip for the future : when such a policy change happens
+>> (this is
+>> a policy change, there were more exceptions in the past before package
+>> freeze,
+>> for leaf packages without weird deps and post/pre scripts and little
+>> impact),
+>> let's try to highlight it *before*.
+>>
+>> There was a communication effort to announce the freeze: I read freeze
+>> announce, was present at the last packager meeting. However it didn't
+>> struck
+>> me, it all looked like the usual end of release cycle, with their
+>> common-sense
+>> exceptions.
+>>
+>> A message such as "contrarily as what happened in the past" (this is the
+>> important part, highlight a *change*), "there will be no exception
+>> even for
+>> leaf non-critical packages, so that you all focus on bugfixes, as we
+>> know that
+>> otherwise you will not fix bugs and continue updating your packages".
+>>
+>> Best regards
+>>
+>> Samuel
+>>
+> I can only chime in with Stormi, in last packager meeting ennael
+> said that new packages would be allowed during the freeze,
+> but we should focus on bug fixes, which is comprehensible.
+> Also misc didn't say anything that new packages are disallowed.
+> 
+> So when did this change and who changed it? Or is it just that the
+> reason given for xonotic was not enough?
+> 
+> I'm just asking in advance, because i've not gotten around to properly
+> testing qtsixa, which i wanted to add for Mageia 2 and to resolve
+> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3362
+> Because i didn't want to import it untested, and another problem
+> is that i can't spare a physical cauldron installation, which made
+> testing a lot more difficult, it's not in Mageia yet.
+> 
+> Also what about adding hardware support as e.g. needed for
+> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4249 ?
+> Also disallowed?
+
+
+Without wanting to cause any problems, I think think this particular
+issue has gotten a little out of hand.
+
+Policy is there for a reason, and we all accept those reasons. We also
+accept that rules are made to be broken and I think it can sometimes be
+said that strict adherence to policy can often be forgone for reasons of
+diplomacy and based on risk vs. reward.
+
+During the mga1 freeze phase, there were was certainly a more relaxed
+approach and I don't think it did any harm, rather the opposite. And by
+"harm" I mean both to the quality of the distro and to the community at
+large.
+
+While I don't personally give two hoots about this package, I suspect
+(and this is just my guess) that misc would have probably pushed the
+package if he'd known it would have caused such a blow out, to avoid the
+general hassle (but the same would not be true if the package had been a
+more core package). Again this is just my suspicion.
+
+
+However, I do feel we need to be more generally open to freeze pushes.
+The justification in this case, IMO, was sufficient and in line with the
+previous interpretations of policy we have expected in the past, but I
+completely respect misc if he still disagrees.
+
+But, please let's all try not get too worked up about this either way.
+
+I'm now going away to try and work out how I can word my freeze push
+request regarding PulseAudio... (only made possible by new kernel) :p
+
+Col
+
+
+-- 
+
+Colin Guthrie
+colin(at)mageia.org
+http://colin.guthr.ie/
+
+Day Job:
+  Tribalogic Limited http://www.tribalogic.net/
+Open Source:
+  Mageia Contributor http://www.mageia.org/
+  PulseAudio Hacker http://www.pulseaudio.org/
+  Trac Hacker http://trac.edgewall.org/
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1