From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f01b3a8c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/012085.html @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] About dm + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] About dm

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Sat Feb 18 15:04:35 CET 2012 +

+
+ +
2012/2/18 Olav Vitters <olav at vitters.nl>:
+> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 02:15:40PM +0100, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+>
+>> Going by the upstream POV we don't need a task-gnome-minimal at all,
+>> you can safely remove it.
+>
+> That is my point of view. Only have task-gnome. And within task-gnome
+> use "Suggest:" for those things which could be removed if someone really
+> wants an minimal installation. At the moment, the "-minimal"
+> installation is different from upstream, yet that is installed by
+> default.
+
+Ok, so we share a similar opinion :)
+I know I did not follow development as close as I should have done to
+be able to discuss here, but in the light of this discussion the
+question comes to my mind why we have "task-gnome-minimal" at all
+although it is not needed and different from upstream.
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1