From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html | 141 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 141 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ef5cc437e --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003563.html @@ -0,0 +1,141 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor)

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Thu Mar 24 09:13:53 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
+
+Quote: Oliver Burger wrote on Thu, 24 March 2011 08:53
+>
+> Am Donnerstag 24 März 2011, 08:23:18 schrieb Tux99:
+> > I think this thread is starting to derail from a simple technical
+> > question
+> > limted to a specific issue (reenabling qt-dev) to an ideological
+> > argument
+> > based greatly on fear and paranoia.
+>
+> It is? I don't think so. Unless you think considerations about
+> conflicts of TDE 
+> with KDE4 are an "ideological argument based greatly on fear and
+> paranoia".
+
+But that's exactly my point, there is posts about fear/paranoia of
+conflicts here in this thread, not a factual argument on real existing
+conflicts.
+Like I said before, KDE3.5 coexisted very well with KDE4 since 2009.1 on
+Mandriva and Trinity is even more so being developed with coexistence in
+mind, so there shouldn't be any unsolvable issues.
+
+But again my point is issues should be debated constructively and factually
+when they are being encountered, not a whole software package being
+dismissed in advance out of general fear and paranoia.
+
+> > The core packages are quite limited in number (6-7 SRPMS), but
+> > already
+> > enable the use of TDE as desktop.
+>
+> As long as those packages (and all the others, that follow) are
+> following the 
+> packaging guidlines, are not conflicting with KDE4 apps and are named
+> in a way 
+> that users see, these are TDE packages, it's ok with me!
+
+This is exactly what I would call a reasonable factual argumentation.
+
+-- 
+Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1