From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5b996c5d4 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110324/003562.html @@ -0,0 +1,116 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor) + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] qt3-devel needed for Trinitydesktop (KDE 3.5 successor)

+ Oliver Burger + oliver.bgr at googlemail.com +
+ Thu Mar 24 08:53:33 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Am Donnerstag 24 März 2011, 08:23:18 schrieb Tux99:
+> I think this thread is starting to derail from a simple technical question
+> limted to a specific issue (reenabling qt-dev) to an ideological argument
+> based greatly on fear and paranoia.
+It is? I don't think so. Unless you think considerations about conflicts of TDE 
+with KDE4 are an "ideological argument based greatly on fear and paranoia".
+
+I do go along with the majority of people writing in this thread. We should 
+not have a DE conflicting with KDE4, we should not have packages or apps by the 
+same name.
+
+> The core packages are quite limited in number (6-7 SRPMS), but already
+> enable the use of TDE as desktop.
+As long as those packages (and all the others, that follow) are following the 
+packaging guidlines, are not conflicting with KDE4 apps and are named in a way 
+that users see, these are TDE packages, it's ok with me!
+
+Oliver
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1