From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html | 89 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 89 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e63800715 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002717.html @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] please keep note of missing dependancies + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] please keep note of missing dependancies

+ Maarten Vanraes + maarten.vanraes at gmail.com +
+ Mon Feb 21 15:17:31 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Op maandag 21 februari 2011 12:45:58 schreef Dexter Morgan:
+> On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Maarten Vanraes
+> 
+> <maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
+> > Op maandag 21 februari 2011 12:10:36 schreef Pascal Terjan:
+> >> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 23:52, Balcaen John <balcaen.john at gmail.com> 
+wrote:
+> >> > Le dimanche 20 février 2011 20:23:30, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+> >> >> Hi,
+> >> >> 
+> >> >> Now and then, i'm refreshing http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ and
+> >> >> sometimes i notice the missing dependancies increasing...
+> >> > 
+> >> > [...]
+> >> > 
+> >> > Maybe we should in fact check dependencies directly from the spec &
+> >> > fix requires before uploading the « main » package ?
+> >> 
+> >> The reason to not reject packages with missing dependencies is for
+> >> bootstrapping
+> >> Sometime one of the subpackages will not be installable immediately,
+> >> but the other subpackage needed to build the package which will
+> >> satisfy this dependency will be.
+> > 
+> > to be honest, i would be in favor of doing such a check, with an
+> > exception usable via mgarepo ( --bootstrapping or something).
+> 
+> why ? why not the time you use by writting those emails for packaging
+> the missing deps ? :)
+
+because it's a safeguard, so people don't have to spend more time later on 
+fixing it. and reducing chance of such failures happening when we really 
+release...
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1