From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..17e46f3f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110221/002711.html @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] please keep note of missing dependancies + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] please keep note of missing dependancies

+ Dexter Morgan + dmorganec at gmail.com +
+ Mon Feb 21 12:45:58 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Maarten Vanraes
+<maarten.vanraes at gmail.com> wrote:
+> Op maandag 21 februari 2011 12:10:36 schreef Pascal Terjan:
+>> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 23:52, Balcaen John <balcaen.john at gmail.com> wrote:
+>> > Le dimanche 20 février 2011 20:23:30, Maarten Vanraes a écrit :
+>> >> Hi,
+>> >>
+>> >> Now and then, i'm refreshing http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ and sometimes
+>> >> i notice the missing dependancies increasing...
+>> >
+>> > [...]
+>> >
+>> > Maybe we should in fact check dependencies directly from the spec & fix
+>> > requires before uploading the « main » package ?
+>>
+>> The reason to not reject packages with missing dependencies is for
+>> bootstrapping
+>> Sometime one of the subpackages will not be installable immediately,
+>> but the other subpackage needed to build the package which will
+>> satisfy this dependency will be.
+>
+> to be honest, i would be in favor of doing such a check, with an exception
+> usable via mgarepo ( --bootstrapping or something).
+>
+
+why ? why not the time you use by writting those emails for packaging
+the missing deps ? :)
+
+ + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1