From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8bf587413 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009237.html @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?

+ Pascal Terjan + pterjan at gmail.com +
+ Mon Oct 31 15:16:24 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 06:12, Funda Wang <fundawang at gmail.com> wrote:
+> Hello,
+>
+> After reading this:
+> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7
+>
+> We will support mageia 2 for 18 months (May 2012 to Nov 2013). But
+> upstream will end ruby 1.8.7 at the time of June 2013. That means, we
+> won't have any support from upstream even for security issues from
+> June 2013 to Nov 2013. Of course, if mageia 2 be delayed....
+>
+> Should we update ruby into 1.9 so that we still have support from upstream?
+>
+> Especially the answer from current maintainer pascal.
+
+I had started updated to 1.9.2 but only spent a few hours on it and
+did not finish
+I think it would be better to have it but I can not decide before
+studying the impact
+
+If someone wants to work on it, Patch0 can be dropped and replaced
+with this option to configure:
+
+-	--with-sitedir=%_prefix/lib/ruby/site_ruby \
+-	--with-vendordir=%_prefix/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby \
++	--with-rubylibprefix=%_prefix/lib/ruby \
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1