From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b0abf6259 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Mon Oct 31 12:09:16 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 14:12 +0800, Funda Wang a écrit :
+> Hello,
+> 
+> After reading this:
+> http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7
+> 
+> We will support mageia 2 for 18 months (May 2012 to Nov 2013). But
+> upstream will end ruby 1.8.7 at the time of June 2013. That means, we
+> won't have any support from upstream even for security issues from
+> June 2013 to Nov 2013. Of course, if mageia 2 be delayed....
+> 
+> Should we update ruby into 1.9 so that we still have support from upstream?
+
+Afaik, ruby 1.9 use a slightly different syntax than ruby 1.8 ( and of
+course, that's slightly incompatible, which translate usually to
+slightly lots of issues ).
+
+I know that puppet just fixed some issue regarding ruby 1.9. I am not
+sure the rest of the crowd is following.
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1