From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html | 137 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..364ebed47 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005331.html @@ -0,0 +1,137 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3 + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Fri Jun 10 12:46:38 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Le jeudi 09 juin 2011 à 10:49 +0100, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
+> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
+> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
+> >>
+> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
+> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed,
+> >> but never realized it had finally agreed on.
+> > 
+> > Same here, I'm a bit surprised.
+> 
+> We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely
+> disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3!
+
+While I have no issue with gnome-shell, I have read enough reports of
+people not happy with it to know we would head to a 2nd kde 4.0 story.
+So maybe we could start to learn from the past and discuss with users to
+explain the update, see why they do not want etc, instead of being
+purely focused on "it is cauldron, let's update everything".  
+
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1