[Mageia-dev] Problems with Gnome 3

Thu Jun 9 12:52:35 CEST 2011

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 12:15:12 +0200, Dexter Morgan <dmorganec at gmail.com> wrote:
+
+> 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
+> > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:49:18 +0100, Colin Guthrie <mageia at colin.guthr.ie> wrote:
+> >
+> >> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble:
+> >> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <jamagallon at ono.com>:
+> >> >>
+> >> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had
+> >> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed,
+> >> >> but never realized it had finally agreed on.
+> >> >
+> >> > Same here, I'm a bit surprised.
+> >>
+> >> We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely
+> >> disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3!
+> >>
+> >> Providing a Gnome2 environment or not is likely the point that need
+> >> discussion :D
+> >>
+
+One other question (that's what pedantic users are for, isn't it ;) ).
+Now we have:
+
+gnome-desktop-2.32.1-1.mga1
+gnome-desktop3-3.0.2-1.mga2
+
+The old one just contains a bunch of generic icons.
+You could post a new gnome-desktop-3.0.x and obsolete both...
+As Gnome moves to 3, no suffix is needed. If ever one is, it would be for
+gnome2 packages one future day, isn't it ?
+
+TIA
+
+-- 
+J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com>     \                 Winter is coming...
+