From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html | 125 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 125 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..808c7bd7b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005220.html @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process

+ Ahmad Samir + ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com +
+ Wed Jun 8 23:48:01 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 8 June 2011 23:38, Stew Benedict <stewbintn at gmail.com> wrote:
+> On 06/08/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
+>>
+>> Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 19:48 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
+>>>
+>>> On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Scherer<misc at zarb.org>  wrote:
+>>>>
+>>>> Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
+>>>>>
+>>>>> Hi there
+>>>>>
+>>>>> We have some stuff to complete here:
+>>>>> http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
+>>>>>
+>>>>> <http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security>Can we spend the 2 or 3
+>>>>> coming
+>>>>> days to finalize it and start updates submits?
+>>>>
+>>>> Pascal is working on this.
+>>>>
+>>>> So here is a proposal :
+>>>> - anybody can submit a package to updates_testing.
+>>>> - once submitted to testing, it should ask to QA to test, along with :
+>>>>  - a reason for the update ( likely bug number )
+>>>>  - potentially a priority ( ie, if this is just a translation update or
+>>>> a urgent 0 day exploit )
+>>>>  - a way to test the bug and see it is fixed
+>>>>  - text for the update
+>>>>
+>>>> - qa validate the update ( with process to define )
+>>>>
+>>>> - someone move the package from updates_testing to testing
+>>>
+>>> Isn't it cleaner to rebuild when submitting to */updates? instead of
+>>> moving.
+>>
+>> Well, that depend on the way package is built. In fact, it should not
+>> matter much, as we should not do a change that could break a existing
+>> software in update, and so this should be the same in updates_testing
+>> ( ie, they should be the same wrto ABI )
+>>
+>> But that's also why I ask here :)
+>>
+>>
+> If you're going to rebuild *after* QA, you've just invalidated your QA.
+> (yeah, I know it *should* be the same, but stuff happens)
+>
+
+You're right (even if that's never happened for 3-4 years in mdv,
+since sec team rebuilt the packages when pushing to */updates IIRC).
+
+>
+> --
+> Stew Benedict
+> New Tazewell, TN
+>
+>
+>
+
+
+
+-- 
+Ahmad Samir
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1