From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1252a5a2c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005217.html @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Finalizing update process

+ Stew Benedict + stewbintn at gmail.com +
+ Wed Jun 8 23:38:00 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
On 06/08/2011 05:31 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
+> Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 19:48 +0300, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
+>> On 8 June 2011 18:44, Michael Scherer<misc at zarb.org>  wrote:
+>>> Le mercredi 08 juin 2011 à 10:40 +0200, Anne nicolas a écrit :
+>>>> Hi there
+>>>>
+>>>> We have some stuff to complete here:
+>>>> http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security
+>>>>
+>>>> <http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=security>Can we spend the 2 or 3 coming
+>>>> days to finalize it and start updates submits?
+>>> Pascal is working on this.
+>>>
+>>> So here is a proposal :
+>>> - anybody can submit a package to updates_testing.
+>>> - once submitted to testing, it should ask to QA to test, along with :
+>>>   - a reason for the update ( likely bug number )
+>>>   - potentially a priority ( ie, if this is just a translation update or
+>>> a urgent 0 day exploit )
+>>>   - a way to test the bug and see it is fixed
+>>>   - text for the update
+>>>
+>>> - qa validate the update ( with process to define )
+>>>
+>>> - someone move the package from updates_testing to testing
+>> Isn't it cleaner to rebuild when submitting to */updates? instead of moving.
+> Well, that depend on the way package is built. In fact, it should not
+> matter much, as we should not do a change that could break a existing
+> software in update, and so this should be the same in updates_testing
+> ( ie, they should be the same wrto ABI )
+>
+> But that's also why I ask here :)
+>
+>
+If you're going to rebuild *after* QA, you've just invalidated your QA. 
+(yeah, I know it *should* be the same, but stuff happens)
+
+
+-- 
+Stew Benedict
+New Tazewell, TN
+
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1