From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2e43dee2d --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006476.html @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Wolfgang Bornath + molch.b at googlemail.com +
+ Fri Jul 8 11:16:38 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
2011/7/8 Thorsten van Lil <tvl83 at gmx.de>:
+> Am 08.07.2011 10:42, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
+>>
+>> 2011/7/8 James Kerr<jim at jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk>:
+>>>
+>>> This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
+>>> re-stated as:
+>>>
+>>> Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be commingled
+>>> in a
+>>> single tainted repository?
+>>
+>> How can tainted software be free software at the same time?
+>>
+>
+> Because free is a matter of license, while tainted is a matter of patents.
+> For example, the libdvdcss2 is free, as the the source-code is open (GPL)
+> but it touches the patent issue, so it's tainted.
+
+Yes, if you regard patents not as a criterium for free or non-free
+then this division makes sense.
+>From that point of view we need the same structure as PLF
+(tainted-free and tainted-non-free).
+
+-- 
+wobo
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1