From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..195e952b1 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-July/006474.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?

+ Thorsten van Lil + tvl83 at gmx.de +
+ Fri Jul 8 10:49:26 CEST 2011 +

+
+ +
Am 08.07.2011 10:42, schrieb Wolfgang Bornath:
+> 2011/7/8 James Kerr<jim at jkerr82508.free-online.co.uk>:
+>> This thread has strayed far from the original question, which could be
+>> re-stated as:
+>>
+>> Should tainted free software and tainted nonfree software be commingled in a
+>> single tainted repository?
+>
+> How can tainted software be free software at the same time?
+>
+
+Because free is a matter of license, while tainted is a matter of patents.
+For example, the libdvdcss2 is free, as the the source-code is open 
+(GPL) but it touches the patent issue, so it's tainted.
+
+Regards,
+Thorsten
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1