From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 80 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5eff58490 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010455.html @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later

+ Manuel Hiebel + manuel at hiebel.eu +
+ Thu Dec 15 00:28:05 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Le jeudi 15 décembre 2011 à 00:14 +0100, nicolas vigier a écrit :
+> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+> 
+> > 
+> > So let's try to make a proposal, if there is a list, after how many
+> > months should a package be removed from the repository if not maintained
+> > ( and by maintained, I do not say "not changes or anything", I really
+> > mean "no one listed as maintainer" ) ?
+> 
+> In my opinion, what we should remove is packages that have important
+> bugs not fixed for a long time. If a package has no official maintainer
+> listed, but has all its bugs fixed quickly, I see no reason to remove it.
+> 
+And what to do with package that have a maintainer, but the packager
+does not fix the bugs or is inactive ? :D
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1