From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..677be1c3f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010453.html @@ -0,0 +1,76 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] Package adoption campaign, 3 months later

+ nicolas vigier + boklm at mars-attacks.org +
+ Thu Dec 15 00:14:23 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+> 
+> So let's try to make a proposal, if there is a list, after how many
+> months should a package be removed from the repository if not maintained
+> ( and by maintained, I do not say "not changes or anything", I really
+> mean "no one listed as maintainer" ) ?
+
+In my opinion, what we should remove is packages that have important
+bugs not fixed for a long time. If a package has no official maintainer
+listed, but has all its bugs fixed quickly, I see no reason to remove it.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1