From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4a09a1d86 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000911.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Michael Scherer + misc at zarb.org +
+ Wed Oct 6 20:31:24 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Le mercredi 06 octobre 2010 à 14:55 -0300, Gustavo Giampaoli a écrit :
+> >> So a one year release cycle with lots of app backports (and maybe a kernel
+> >> backport mid-cycle if there is important new hardware support) is IMHO the
+> >> best release cycle for 'normal' users.
+> 
+> Just take a look to Windows XP users. Almost 10 years of bugfixes and
+> patches almost without any mayor change in the OS. But XP is still on
+> the road. And it's because you can have the latest software "and"
+> hardware in your ten years old OS.
+> 
+> I'm not saying that Mageia should last ten years. But IMHO that "XP
+> case" is a valid example.
+
+Sure, when we will have the money of Microsoft, and the team they have
+for QA, I am sure we will be able to do it too... 
+
+And of course, when we will also have hardware maker that will provides
+drivers. 
+-- 
+Michael Scherer
+
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1