From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..283d13c06 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101006/000909.html @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Gustavo Giampaoli + giampaoli.gustavo at gmail.com +
+ Wed Oct 6 19:55:06 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
>> So a one year release cycle with lots of app backports (and maybe a kernel
+>> backport mid-cycle if there is important new hardware support) is IMHO the
+>> best release cycle for 'normal' users.
+
+Just take a look to Windows XP users. Almost 10 years of bugfixes and
+patches almost without any mayor change in the OS. But XP is still on
+the road. And it's because you can have the latest software "and"
+hardware in your ten years old OS.
+
+I'm not saying that Mageia should last ten years. But IMHO that "XP
+case" is a valid example.
+
+Cheers!
+
+
+
+Gustavo Giampaoli (aka tavillo1980)
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1