From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 115 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..610c09e6a --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000838.html @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Ahmad Samir + ahmadsamir3891 at gmail.com +
+ Tue Oct 5 15:47:20 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
On 5 October 2010 15:28, Tux99 <tux99-mga at uridium.org> wrote:
+>
+>
+> Personally I think the way Mandriva maintains both updates and backports
+> for each release is a waste of resources.
+>
+
+How is it a waste?
+
+A practical example is the college professor / school teacher (see
+Fernando Parra post a few emails back); he doesn't want to upgrade the
+boxes in the lab, he doesn't care if they have the newest/shiniest
+versions, just that the distro is stable and works(tm). The same
+applies for a company, servers... etc. We aren't talking only about
+personal boxes that can break without too much drastic consequences.
+
+> I do agree that Mageia should be a semi-rolling distro.
+>
+> By "semi rolling distro" I mean the following:
+>
+> Release a distro every 8-12 months (the exact cyle is not the point I'm
+> debating here, it could be 6 months too, it doesn't mater for the concept
+> I'm trying to explain).
+>
+> Provide updates/security patches for all the basic stuff that has a lot of
+> dependencies (kernel, core libs, kde, gnome, xorg, etc.).
+>
+> Provide newer release rather than backported security patches for all other
+> apps.
+>
+> In other words, backports (rather than backported security fixes) should be
+> the rule for everything apart from the core system stuff that has loads of
+> dependencies.
+>
+> This would reduce the space requirements on the mirrors and it would mean
+> that Mageia is a "rolling distro" for most apps, making it more attractive
+> compared to ubuntu/Fedora/opensuse and at the same time reduce the workload
+> for packagers.
+>
+>
+
+Again a rolling distro is something that's not clearly defined. And to
+be honest, a rolling distro isn't suitable for new or inexperienced
+users. Simply because you can't guarantee that a new package won't
+introduce regressions (or totally break an app), in this case an
+experienced user will know how to revert to an older version, a new or
+inexperienced user won't.
+
+Look at the rolling distros that've been mentioned, Debian or Gentoo,
+right? would anyone recommend Debian or Gentoo for a
+new/inexperienced/non-power user?
+
+-- 
+Ahmad Samir
+
+ + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1