From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html | 90 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34361284c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101005/000836.html @@ -0,0 +1,90 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Tux99 + tux99-mga at uridium.org +
+ Tue Oct 5 15:28:31 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
+
+Personally I think the way Mandriva maintains both updates and backports
+for each release is a waste of resources.
+
+I do agree that Mageia should be a semi-rolling distro.
+
+By "semi rolling distro" I mean the following:
+
+Release a distro every 8-12 months (the exact cyle is not the point I'm
+debating here, it could be 6 months too, it doesn't mater for the concept
+I'm trying to explain).
+
+Provide updates/security patches for all the basic stuff that has a lot of
+dependencies (kernel, core libs, kde, gnome, xorg, etc.).
+
+Provide newer release rather than backported security patches for all other
+apps.
+
+In other words, backports (rather than backported security fixes) should be
+the rule for everything apart from the core system stuff that has loads of
+dependencies.
+
+This would reduce the space requirements on the mirrors and it would mean
+that Mageia is a "rolling distro" for most apps, making it more attractive
+compared to ubuntu/Fedora/opensuse and at the same time reduce the workload
+for packagers.
+
+
+ + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1