From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..191784930 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000604.html @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ Arthur Cheung + theartoforz at gmail.com +
+ Fri Oct 1 16:38:42 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
Hi  atilla ontas
+
+I support 6-month release circle,and i think Mageia should be relased
+in winter and summer to avoid direct competition with Ubuntu and
+Fedora.
+
+As for naming, scheme,the Mandriva way is ok.
+
+BTW :
+I'm from china and i can do some translation jobs,if needed.
+
+2010/10/1, atilla ontas <tarakbumba at gmail.com>:
+> I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every
+> 6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should
+> make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't
+> be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like
+> systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a
+> year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors
+> space waste.
+>
+> One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
+> we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
+> suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
+> code names.
+>
+> What's your opinion?
+>
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1