From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d228afda3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101001/000555.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle? + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] How will be the realese cycle?

+ atilla ontas + tarakbumba at gmail.com +
+ Fri Oct 1 08:51:34 CEST 2010 +

+
+ +
I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every
+6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should
+make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't
+be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like
+systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a
+year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors
+space waste.
+
+One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do
+we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and
+suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using
+code names.
+
+What's your opinion?
+
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1