summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html171
1 files changed, 171 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f575991ec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-March/003003.html
@@ -0,0 +1,171 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%0A%09core/release%09tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1&In-Reply-To=%3C20110303171704.GC21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003002.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003005.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1</H1>
+ <B>nicolas vigier</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%0A%09core/release%09tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1&In-Reply-To=%3C20110303171704.GC21938%40mars-attacks.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1">boklm at mars-attacks.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Mar 3 18:17:04 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003002.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003005.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3003">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3003">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3003">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3003">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 &#224; 14:58 +0100, nicolas vigier a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Thu, 03 Mar 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Le jeudi 03 mars 2011 &#224; 11:07 +0100, Romain d'Alverny a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; Giving your name is not a loss of privacy. Giving an email address
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; contact is not a loss of privacy.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; It depend to who you give it. And given
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; <A HREF="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/privacy">http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/privacy</A> , I think it can be
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; qualified to be, yes.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; So while some people do not see problem with this, some others do, and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; we should listen to their wishes. After a quick check, there is around
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 10 people out of 250 in the directory with obviously fake names ( cause
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; I think no one is called &quot;palm pre&quot; ).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Some people may have very good reasons to not wanting to give their real
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; name or email address. I know several companies where the manager is ok
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; to send stuff upstream, but do not the name of the company to be
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; mentioned ( for example some divisions of France Telecom do this and
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; there is also some rumors about Trolltech doing the same before Nokia
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; era ).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I think that's not a problem here. We're not checking ID of people who
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; create accounts, so they can use the name they want to be called.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Not yet. What about the day someone will propose to use gpg and the web
+</I>&gt;<i> of trust ( who is currently based on checking ID card ) for some stuff ?
+</I>
+If we decide one day that we require signed gpg key, then we can discuss
+that day the details of what kind of signatures we require. Today we
+don't require anything like this. But it's possible to sign key without
+checking ID card. GPG signature doesn't necessarily mean &quot;this personn
+has this official name&quot;, it can also mean &quot;this is the real owner of
+this email, and owner of this non-official name&quot;.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; They are also not forced to use their work email, they can create an email
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; just for this.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; So I don't know what the problem is exactly.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If the argument is &quot;if people do not like giving informations, they can
+</I>&gt;<i> simply not tell the truth&quot;, yes I see this as a problem, because we are
+</I>&gt;<i> quite inconsistent.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On identity.m.o, we do ask :
+</I>&gt;<i> - login
+</I>&gt;<i> - email
+</I>&gt;<i> - personal information
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Login is obviously required.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> For email, yes, we need to have one, that's a technical requirement on
+</I>&gt;<i> this part, we cannot do much, except clearly telling to people what it
+</I>&gt;<i> would be used for, if they can use a trash email or not, etc, etc.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Problem is asking for Last name/First name.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Identity.m.o will be used almost everywhere, like for example on the
+</I>&gt;<i> forum.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Some people may find invasive to give Last name/First name especially
+</I>&gt;<i> for posting on a forum when compared to all others ( I checked several
+</I>&gt;<i> french forums, none requires giving anything except a email and a
+</I>&gt;<i> login ).
+</I>
+Many forums require a username, and a display name. If you open an
+account on linuxfr for instance, you need to enter a login name, and a
+full name (which doesn't have to be your real name). And I think most
+people on linuxfr don't use their real name, and they see no problem
+being asked a full name. On almost all websites I know where users can
+post messages, they are asked both a login name (which is sometime the
+same as the email) and a display name.
+
+Even when you setup an email account, most email software will ask you
+to enter a full name. If sending an email without a full name, I think
+I remember that spamassassin will flag it as spam.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So either we care about having this information ( for example for legal
+</I>&gt;<i> reasons ) and in this case, this must be clearly explained, and then we
+</I>&gt;<i> may have to be more stringent depending on requirements. In this case,
+</I>&gt;<i> we cannot say &quot;you can enter what you want&quot;.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Or we do not care about the personal information, then it should also be
+</I>&gt;<i> clear. And I see no clearer way to say &quot;this is not required&quot; that not
+</I>&gt;<i> requiring it upon creation of the account.
+</I>
+The problem is that many software, like bugzilla, forums, or rpm changelogs
+require a login name (only one word without spaces) or email, and a
+display name. I see no use to waste time to patch all those software to
+add a special case (adding more complexity and more bugs) for the user
+who doesn't want to set any display name, when a simple solution is to
+simply set a name that is not your real name, if you want to hide your
+real name.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> IMHO, we should not adopt the sloppy practice of others websites of
+</I>&gt;<i> saying so mandatory when this is not.
+</I>
+It is not a &quot;sloppy practice&quot;. It is that a login name is not very nice
+to display, so a full name is asked.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Telling to users to workaround this by giving incorrect information do
+</I>&gt;<i> not seems like a very good way to show we care about people.
+</I>
+It is not giving incorrect information, it is giving the name the user
+wants to be called.
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003002.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003005.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [RPM] cauldron core/release tagtool-0.12.3-2.mga1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3003">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3003">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3003">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3003">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>