summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html143
1 files changed, 143 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..826db532f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-April/003402.html
@@ -0,0 +1,143 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] Users authentication on forums
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Users%20authentication%20on%20forums&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTi%3D-KGb1DRRaeYDmHaCPPYhrg6rsmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003400.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003336.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] Users authentication on forums</H1>
+ <B>Romain d'Alverny</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Users%20authentication%20on%20forums&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTi%3D-KGb1DRRaeYDmHaCPPYhrg6rsmg%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] Users authentication on forums">rda at mageia.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue Apr 26 21:59:57 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003400.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Users authentication on forums
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003336.html">[Mageia-sysadm] packages uploaded only on x86_64
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3402">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3402">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3402">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3402">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hi there,
+
+a small update because I was not convinced - and waiting for beta2 was
+a good time. :-p
+
+On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 01:10, Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> - openid/oauth manage the authentication ( and some vcard stuff ) but
+</I>&gt;<i> not the autorisation. For example, Transifex ( and others django
+</I>&gt;<i> application ) do use ldap groups for autorisation and I think that's
+</I>&gt;<i> rather a good idea to manage this using ldap.
+</I>
+OAuth is about authorizing a 3rd party application to get access to a
+set of credentials (on user acceptance) - that could include groups.
+And many other things. So that's still up to your local app to use
+that for authorization.
+
+&gt;<i> - I think that telling to people &quot;it is ok to give your Mageia password
+</I>&gt;<i> for services that are not managed by mageia.org sysadmins&quot;
+</I>
+OpenID/OAuth are precisely designed to avoid this.
+
+&gt;<i> I recognize the solution was smart and reusing a standard protocol is quite
+</I>&gt;<i> clever, but the whole situation is more complex than just &quot;delegating
+</I>&gt;<i> authentication should solve the issue&quot;.
+</I>
+It's not about delegating authentication, that stays on mageia.org servers.
+
+I understand your point too. Anyway. Let's see it again from a
+different perspective now. No offense intended to anyone, but just
+stating it plain.
+
+Choosing this current scheme (LDAP + Perl-based Web frontend + strict
+policy on authentication/authorization scheme) makes it:
+ - something completely centralised where, when someone could
+add/extend an application to the Mageia ecosystem, it has to ask for
+permission first (LDAP app-specific credentials, app hosting control),
+instead of just using a piece of infrastructure that would enable
+users to use it (OAuth + open APIs) and giving their permission - and
+keeping control of it; I am not saying that Web developers are craving
+to do that at once, but preventing this sort of thing from happening
+doesn't help;
+ - discussions about improvements cut down for the sake of not
+patching pieces of code, making the whole thing so generic, that it
+will stay generic (genericity is good, but not at the price of not
+progressing/making new stuff).
+
+We can either decide to stay like this - but I'm not sure to see the
+point because it doesn't scale - beyond that it's not really
+interesting either. Yes, the sysadmin team is not extensible and would
+welcome hands to help - showing too conservative a status will not
+help either.
+
+Or decide that we need to open and let go a bit more and design all
+our services in a more modular/flexible way, yet secure. And if
+needed, ask for help on the outside, among people that would be
+willing to help (not only volunteers, but companies whose interest
+could align with dedicating some employees time with the project). For
+instance, continuing as it is today, but accepting to set up an OAuth
+provider service in a given perimeter, plugging it in LDAP with the
+auth part still in mageia.org, and see how things go from there?
+
+Note that I'm not arguing against the team or anyone here, but for a
+different take on how some services may be provided in a more flexible
+way. :-) I'm sure a set of beers and a whiteboard would help a lot
+here but all we have for now is this text-based thing.
+
+(that's not a binary switch - I discussed with some of af83 engineers
+about one of their project they demonstrated at WebWorkersCamp past
+week-end (<A HREF="https://github.com/AF83/auth_server">https://github.com/AF83/auth_server</A> ) - and it seems they
+would be happy to help with this - that's in part why I suggest a bit
+more about this)
+
+So the question, to sum it up is this: would the sysadmin team be ok with:
+ - experimenting such an authorization gateway (as oauth2 here) that
+would allow other apps to use Mageia user accounts for
+authentication/authorization;
+ - possibly setup and implemented/provided by non sysadmins
+
+It's not about setting a fight between systems integrity/admin and
+foolish experiments/developments - it's about allowing ideas to bubble
+through the project without too many obstacles in the middle.
+
+No hurry either, better make sure everyone is on par on this.
+
+
+Cheers,
+
+Romain
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003400.html">[Mageia-sysadm] Users authentication on forums
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003336.html">[Mageia-sysadm] packages uploaded only on x86_64
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3402">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3402">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3402">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3402">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>