diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120311/25fd1eed/attachment-0001.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120311/25fd1eed/attachment-0001.html | 50 |
1 files changed, 50 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120311/25fd1eed/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120311/25fd1eed/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6cab9261c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120311/25fd1eed/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +<p><br> +Le 11 mars 2012 12:15, "Wolfgang Bornath" <<a href="mailto:molch.b@googlemail.com">molch.b@googlemail.com</a>> a écrit :<br> +><br> +> 2012/3/11 Luc Menut <<a href="mailto:lmenut@free.fr">lmenut@free.fr</a>>:<br> +> > Le 10/03/2012 23:49, Oliver Burger a écrit :<br> +> >><br> +> >> Am 10.03.2012 23:46, schrieb Juan Luis Baptiste:<br> +> ><br> +> > [...]<br> +> >>><br> +> >>> Right now, the splitting of the handbook packages will use the same<br> +> >>> bandwidth as before. As Anssi said, before the handbooks came bundled<br> +> >>> with the owner package, so they were also being installed. So<br> +> >>> bandwidth wise, is still the same as before the splitting.<br> +> >>><br> +> >> I haven't looked into it, but perhaps we could install those handbooks<br> +> >> as Suggests instead of Requires (or is it already done that way?).<br> +> >> Then people wanting to save bandwidth could just install using<br> +> >> "--no-suggests".<br> +> ><br> +> ><br> +> > I don't agree. Handbooks are fully part of a kde install; they should be<br> +> > installed, and shouldn't be removed. A kde install without handbooks is a<br> +> > damaged kde install. Do you think that the kde doc team will continue to<br> +> > work on handbooks if each distrib don't install its work?<br> +> > That's why, personally I think the exact opposite; each component should<br> +> > *requires* its handbook (but probably it won't work with LiveCD).<br> +><br> +> I don't agree. You seem to first take for granted that a user of the<br> +> KDE desktop also uses all the applications and second you mistake<br> +> "good to have" for "must have". I'm using KDE but only few KDE<br> +> applications - so why do I need a handbook for kppp or knode or kmail<br> +> when I don't even install these applications? I would happily<br> +> de-install such handbooks as I regularly unmark grub-doc and similar<br> +> packages from installation.<br> +><br> +> In your previous reply to Juergen you also showed that you<br> +> misunderstood his wish for Mageia documentation. It is good and<br> +> important that documentation is available if needed. But it must not<br> +> be forced on those who don't want/need it.<br> +><br> +> I may add that I have been involved in documentation writing and<br> +> translating for almost 7 years. But I never thought that users must<br> +> use it if they don't need it.<br> +><br> +> --<br> +> wobo</p> +<p>I agree that documentation has to be available with the application i use. While i use the program and i need more infos i press F1. If the handbook it is not available what i will have ? A message informs me that the doc is missing or it has to be installed manualy? </p> + +<p>As when you get any product it comes with its manual, i believe that the handbook of an application is a must have, and an application should never be installed without its documentation.</p> |