diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607')
6 files changed, 140 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + <title></title> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : + <blockquote cite="mid:20110607080033.GA5019@bkor.dhs.org" + type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep +and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable +and reliable and complete yet. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel. + +Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports? +This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <font face="Liberation Sans"><br> + The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest. <br> + <br> + But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable. <br> + </font> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a2cde751c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + <title></title> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a écrit : + <blockquote cite="mid:20110607080033.GA5019@bkor.dhs.org" + type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep +and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable +and reliable and complete yet. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel. + +Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports? +This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <font face="Liberation Sans"><br> + The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I + need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on + the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had + quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing. + But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need + to retest. <br> + <br> + But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in + case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually + Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough + people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am + simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and + stable. <br> + </font> + </body> +</html> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f0c3e4824 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olav@vitters.nl">olav@vitters.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> +On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:<br> +> On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep<br> +> and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable<br> +> and reliable and complete yet.<br> +<br> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll<br> +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like<br> +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.<br></blockquote></div>Fallback mode would be killed someday....<br><br>I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace<br><br>GNOME2.<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f0c3e4824 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/2c6f779a/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olav@vitters.nl">olav@vitters.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"> +On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:<br> +> On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep<br> +> and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable<br> +> and reliable and complete yet.<br> +<br> +GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll<br> +give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like<br> +GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.<br></blockquote></div>Fallback mode would be killed someday....<br><br>I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace<br><br>GNOME2.<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4bcbbb7d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +Until today i was using F15 with Gnome3, now i use Mageia with LXDE, and i like it, looks nice so.<br><br>I'm not a packager, yet, so i am not able to maintain gnome3 for mageia.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:18 PM, philippe makowski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:makowski.mageia@gmail.com">makowski.mageia@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">2011/6/7 Thomas Lottmann <<a href="mailto:skiperdrake@gmail.com">skiperdrake@gmail.com</a>>:<br> +<div class="im">> Personally, I am not convinced Gnome 3 is good yet, essentially in terms of<br> +> productivity. So it is not only because of some technical issues that may<br> +> appear more or less randomly, but also because of the concept of Gnome 3<br> +> itself. But this is very subjective<br> +</div>yes very<br> +<br> +Before the storm and lightning damage my main computer, I was using<br> +F15 with Gnome 3<br> +and I like it<br> +<br> +now I have a box under Mageia, and I miss Gnome 3 ;)<br> +<br> +but I like Mageia of course<br> +</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mit freundlichen Grüßen<br><br>Greetings<br><br>Daniel Kreuter<br><br><br><br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4bcbbb7d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/eddaaa67/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +Until today i was using F15 with Gnome3, now i use Mageia with LXDE, and i like it, looks nice so.<br><br>I'm not a packager, yet, so i am not able to maintain gnome3 for mageia.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 7:18 PM, philippe makowski <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:makowski.mageia@gmail.com">makowski.mageia@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br> +<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">2011/6/7 Thomas Lottmann <<a href="mailto:skiperdrake@gmail.com">skiperdrake@gmail.com</a>>:<br> +<div class="im">> Personally, I am not convinced Gnome 3 is good yet, essentially in terms of<br> +> productivity. So it is not only because of some technical issues that may<br> +> appear more or less randomly, but also because of the concept of Gnome 3<br> +> itself. But this is very subjective<br> +</div>yes very<br> +<br> +Before the storm and lightning damage my main computer, I was using<br> +F15 with Gnome 3<br> +and I like it<br> +<br> +now I have a box under Mageia, and I miss Gnome 3 ;)<br> +<br> +but I like Mageia of course<br> +</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Mit freundlichen Grüßen<br><br>Greetings<br><br>Daniel Kreuter<br><br><br><br> |