diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/6a8348a2/attachment.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/6a8348a2/attachment.html | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/6a8348a2/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/6a8348a2/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c5a77e837 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/6a8348a2/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/21 Tux99 <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tux99-mga@uridium.org">tux99-mga@uridium.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> +<div class="im">On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, vfmBOFH wrote:<br> +><br> +> Similar to the (failed) mandriva assembly, huh?<br> +><br> +> I think it can be a good scheme. And comes with some "extras" like localized<br> +> communities can "elect" their representative on the future associaton, and<br> +> turns the "central hub" in a open discuss for them. If this scheme sucess,<br> +> transparency and openess of the representative's discursons are guaranteed.<br> +<br> +<br> +</div>Since vfmBOFH mentions the failed mandriva assembly, I'd like to suggest<br> +to please keep the organisational structure as flat as possible.<br> +<br> +On the internet where everyone has equal possibilities to be informed<br> +and partecipate we don't need multi-level hierarchical structures with<br> +so called local community representatives that have special rights or<br> +influence.<br> +<br> +As we just saw during the first days of Mageia, the opinion of some<br> +local community representatives don't necessarily match at all with the<br> +opinions of the members of their community.<br> +<br> +So personally I don't see any point in local community representatives<br> +as decision makers. If anything they should make sure that their<br> +communities are informaed by arranging translations of relevant<br> +information and manage their local forums, events etc.<br> +<br> +Any voting on global Mageia issues should be open to everyone, there<br> +should be no delegations or representations as that's not necessary on<br> +the internet.<br> +<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br> +_______________________________________________<br> +Mageia-discuss mailing list<br> +<a href="mailto:Mageia-discuss@mageia.org">Mageia-discuss@mageia.org</a><br> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss</a><br> +</div></div></blockquote></div><br>I did not say that representatives are decison makers. As its position indicates, they "represent" their respective communities. Their vote (or decision) *must* be their communities one.<br> +<br>On the other hand, if every aspect of the distro should be voted on by each and every one of its users, the process of implementing a change would be too slow for what we are accustomed. I do not see the community voting en masse (and agreeing!) On every aspect of the distro.<br> +<br>The "central hub" should be seen as a "parliament", where users (who have previously elected their representatives) are represented.<br><br> |