summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html146
1 files changed, 146 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..af284d338
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120420/007068.html
@@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] A proposal of some kind to get point of views &amp; comments
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20A%20proposal%20of%20some%20kind%20to%20get%20point%20of%20views%0A%20%26%20comments&In-Reply-To=%3C4F91CB62.60906%40gmx.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="007065.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="007063.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] A proposal of some kind to get point of views &amp; comments</H1>
+ <B>Sebastian sebsebseb</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20A%20proposal%20of%20some%20kind%20to%20get%20point%20of%20views%0A%20%26%20comments&In-Reply-To=%3C4F91CB62.60906%40gmx.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] A proposal of some kind to get point of views &amp; comments">sebsebseb_mageia at gmx.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Apr 20 22:47:30 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007065.html">[Mageia-discuss] A proposal of some kind to get point of views &amp; comments
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="007063.html">[Mageia-discuss] Configuring external monitor display
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#7068">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#7068">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#7068">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#7068">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On 20/04/12 19:27, Kristoffer Grundstr&#246;m wrote:
+&gt;<i> Hi!
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Now &amp; then I tend to loose my mind &amp; install Ubuntu on one of my
+</I>&gt;<i> computers &amp; the last time I did it I heard about PPA's. I added a PPA
+</I>&gt;<i> &amp; noticed how fun it was to test the code that it offers.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> This is the explanation of what PPA is &amp; does according to the
+</I>&gt;<i> Ubuntu-page:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> *&quot;Personal Package Archives (PPA) allow you to upload Ubuntu source
+</I>&gt;<i> packages to be built and published as an apt repository by Launchpad.&quot;*
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> My idea would be something similar.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It starts with the user that gets annoyed how some Mageia-packages
+</I>&gt;<i> that are meant to be stable that they aren't.
+</I>&gt;<i> Instead of having to do the job themselves they can just add a special
+</I>&gt;<i> media called user-contrib that contains packages built from git-source
+</I>&gt;<i> to be tested in Cauldron &amp; then released as Backport-version when
+</I>&gt;<i> confirmed stable enough to see if the issue they had on the officially
+</I>&gt;<i> stable package is gone.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I know that it would take many people to build thoose, but I'm willing
+</I>&gt;<i> to download git-code &amp; compile &amp; build for Mageia.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I've already managed to compile &amp; build the latest official version of
+</I>&gt;<i> Transmission without using the official Mageia patches &amp; I've got NO
+</I>&gt;<i> problem at all using the package.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Test theese packages &amp; say what you think:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.153.84/c75b5l1s469g/yljxa1e92l5mmix/transmission-debug-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm">http://199.91.152.243/2wm8pbg3k5eg/9th0m5xxslth99a/transmission-2.51%2B-1.x86_64.rpm</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> /Kristoffer
+</I>
+Hi
+
+I have thought about it before how it could be useful after Mageia 2 has
+been released for there to be PPA's or something like it for Mageia.
+
+With Ubuntu PPA's are really just repo's that can be added by users so
+that they can get later versions of software that aren't in the Ubuntu
+repo's. With PPA's it's meant to be known as well that they may be
+buggy, because usually they have just been made by developers/packagers
+or something like that I think, and not gone through a proper Quality
+Assurance process. Really they are meant to be aimed at more experienced
+users, but it seems that more recently since 2008 or something like
+that, that quite a lot of less experienced Ubuntu users may also have at
+least one PPA installed. Also to many installed PPA's can cause issues
+with the Ubuntu install.
+
+I have been thinking before about the current Mageia release cycle and
+when it comes to Gnome. Since the 9 months release cycle for example, it
+seems that sometimes a new major version of Gnome will have to be
+skipped, as in not offered by Mageia as an update for any supported
+stable final release at the time. I am not a developer, but I assume
+those versions of Gnome can be put into Cauldron and then backported to
+the current stable release as well, or put into something like a PPA for
+users to install into final Mageia releases. As for Cauldron it should
+keep on having the latest versions of Gnome, usually development versions.
+
+In general most Desktop Linux users want the latest final versions of
+the software that they use it seems, and I think that it would be good
+if there was a easy way to offer this for most or all packages. This is
+where something like Ubuntu's PPA's would come in.
+
+I think if Mageia has something like PPA's, they shouldn't need to
+require QA from the QA team and it should be known users and potential
+users that they may be buggy/unstable. Where as backports of course
+will have gone through the Mageia QA team process.
+
+As for the PPA's themselves or the something like it, would need a
+website for it like they have for Ubuntu
+<A HREF="https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas">https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+ppas</A> and they should only be offered on
+the site from people who have gone through the Mageia packaging process
+and become trusted packagers I think.
+
+<A HREF="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/">http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/ubuntu-ppa-technology-explained/</A>
+
+<A HREF="https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA">https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA</A>
+
+ From Sebastian sebsebseb
+
+
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20120420/4eeecfb3/attachment-0001.html&gt;
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="007065.html">[Mageia-discuss] A proposal of some kind to get point of views &amp; comments
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="007063.html">[Mageia-discuss] Configuring external monitor display
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#7068">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#7068">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#7068">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#7068">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>