diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html | 81 |
1 files changed, 81 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a1d3934e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120208/006434.html @@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20A%20possible%20risk%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1328711516.2207.47.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006426.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006435.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ?</H1> + <B>Michael Scherer</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20A%20possible%20risk%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1328711516.2207.47.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ?">misc at zarb.org + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Feb 8 15:31:56 CET 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006426.html">[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006435.html">[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6434">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6434">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6434">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6434">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Le mercredi 08 février 2012 à 12:47 +0000, Claire Robinson a écrit : +><i> On 08/02/12 12:35, Michael Scherer wrote: +</I> +><i> I don't think QA is an issue regarding updates to 1. Do you really feel +</I>><i> that way or were you meaning in a more general way? +</I> +The upgrade problem was on mandriva 2010.2, why relate this to mageia +1 ? + +And yes, i speak on a general note, the problem with letting people do +updates is when updates are bad and faulty, and that's something that +would have been caused either by lack of QA ( from distributor side ), +or by a user doing what we said to not do, like mixing packages, etc +( for example, using MIB backports ) + +><i> Ensuring an upgrade path from Mandriva 2010.2 is really something we (QA +</I>><i> team) would expect maintainers to maintain. +</I> +Sure, can you tell where it was broken ? + +-- +Michael Scherer + +</PRE> + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006426.html">[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006435.html">[Mageia-discuss] A possible risk ? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#6434">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#6434">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#6434">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#6434">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |