summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html135
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..eab5e8d65
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20120128/006350.html
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BPoll%5D%20What%20are%20your%20top%20requirements%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1327786682.2844.23.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006347.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="006351.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BPoll%5D%20What%20are%20your%20top%20requirements%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1327786682.2844.23.camel%40liliana.cdg.redhat.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Jan 28 22:38:02 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006347.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006351.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6350">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6350">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6350">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6350">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le samedi 28 janvier 2012 &#224; 20:37 +0100, Antoine Pitrou a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 20:19:45 +0100
+</I>&gt;<i> Wolfgang Bornath &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; (and let's not talk about &quot;Modern GUI&quot;: for me Gnome 2 is as modern as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; Gnome 3 and KDE 4)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &quot;modern&quot; in this context means &quot;opposed to the traditional GUIs&quot;.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;traditional&quot; is undefined. Is Gnome 2 traditional? What about Gnustep?
+</I>&gt;<i> And Cinnamon?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> For example, I'd like to see Cinnamon in the next Mageia, not because
+</I>&gt;<i> it's traditional or modern, but because it's for me the only reasonable
+</I>&gt;<i> compensation for losing Gnome 2.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; So, I've answered the poll, but my real answer is the following: if I
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; had to use a distribution with only 3 qualities out of all these, I
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; would be an unhappy user.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Looks like you did not read the initial posting where I explain what I
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; mean with &quot;top requirements&quot;. Of course I could have allowed for 5 or
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 10 votes, but my intention is to find out the most important features
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; a distribution must have, otherwise you would not touch it.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Well, what I'm saying is that &quot;top requirements&quot; is not how I function,
+</I>&gt;<i> and I don't think it's how most users function either.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I mean, I certainly want no crashes (who wants crashes in the middle
+</I>&gt;<i> of an editing session?) and I certainly want hardware support (otherwise
+</I>&gt;<i> how would I use my computer?), but I also want stability, good support,
+</I>&gt;<i> a nice community, a good choice of software, etc. I don't draw a
+</I>&gt;<i> hierarchy of these criteria: they are *all* important.
+</I>
+The issue is that they cannot be done all at the same time.
+
+You cannot have te latest hardware support and at the same time expect a
+crash free support of the same hardware, we unfortunately do not write
+bug free softwares at the first time.
+
+While I appreciate Wobo efforts to get meaningful numbers, I am rather
+doubtful about a few things. First, the choice of questions make me
+wonder, since my memories tell me that for doing such kind of polls, you
+first need to do preliminary research to find the options.
+There is for example various things like :
+&quot;networking out of the box&quot;, and &quot;good hardware recognition&quot; that are
+the same.
+same for &quot;latest software&quot; vs &quot;quick update&quot;.
+And LTS go hand to hand with &quot;stable as top priority&quot; ( since LTS mean
+the system do not change for a long time, and usually, once enough bugs
+are fixed, softwares are rather stable ).
+
+Not to mention that a poll may give incorrect expectation to people, and
+usually only measure a fraction of the users.
+
+And more importantly, it doesn't help us on the crucial thing ( IMHO ),
+how to expend the contributeurs pool.
+
+I think asking &quot;where would you want to put efforts in the next year for
+Mageia&quot; would allow us to better see what kind of priority we should
+have to grow the community. ( followed by discussions of &quot;why don't you
+do it now&quot; that would help finding potential weak spots in the system ).
+
+This or asking directly, &quot;why don't you work on $FOO&quot;. Users will come
+when we have a great product ( ie, grow naturally up to a point ). And
+product will be great with enough contribution, hence the focus on that.
+
+&gt;<i> This poll sounds like you might end up concluding &quot;ok, our users value
+</I>&gt;<i> features over stability, so we're gonna make a crashy distro with many
+</I>&gt;<i> features&quot;. Surely you understand how unreasonable that is: even these
+</I>&gt;<i> users which said they values features will still get angry about the
+</I>&gt;<i> crashes.
+</I>
+Yup, I agree. But it seems people want stability.
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006347.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="006351.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Poll] What are your top requirements?
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#6350">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#6350">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#6350">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#6350">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>