summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html145
1 files changed, 145 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..6bf9924a9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20110302/003834.html
@@ -0,0 +1,145 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Linux%20is%20a%20KERNEL%20not%20an%20OS&In-Reply-To=%3C4D6E6839.5000606%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003841.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003839.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Linux%20is%20a%20KERNEL%20not%20an%20OS&In-Reply-To=%3C4D6E6839.5000606%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Mar 2 16:54:33 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003841.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003839.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3834">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3834">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3834">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3834">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>James Kerr a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On 02/03/11 12:24, Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 2011/3/2 Romain d'Alverny&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 12:13, Michael Scherer&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 22:29:09 -0600, Richard Couture wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Throughout the pages at www.Mageia.org there are references to Linux
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> as if it is an OS or a distribution, [...]
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I would propose that if you wish to do it right, to first do it
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> right from
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> a mageia point of view. IE, that you should first post
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> on the proper ml ( ie one dedicated to web, or marketing, I would
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> start by
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> marcom ). [...]
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Yep. The point is relevant (common language use vs. precision) so
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> thank you Richard for bringing this up, in a good way.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Second, if you really want to do it right, you should IMHO start with a
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> patch, [...]
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Although before a patch, the right message replacement should be
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> defined in marcom first.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Three, [...]
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> And please avoid the &quot;politically [in]correct&quot; thing, it is fuzzy at
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> best and it contributes to defuse the stance.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> As a side note, you will note that the Mageia end-product is to be
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> called &quot;Mageia&quot; and not &quot;Mageia Linux&quot; (neither &quot;Mageia GNU/Linux&quot; for
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> that matter). If it does, it's a matter of imprecision we can fix. And
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> we did launch the project as &quot;Mageia, the new Linux distribution&quot; -
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> this was a temporary launch title and it had to be short.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> So the fix will be more in how we define this Mageia product as such
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> (&quot;operating system&quot;? &quot;GNU/Linux distribution&quot;? st else?) and relative
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> to what it uses/gathers (GNU/Linux indeed, but not only).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> As a side note:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I met RMS when he held a speech in Frankfurt. He told me that he will
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> not visit Linuxtag (nor reply to an invitation for a key note) until
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> they change the event's name to &quot;GNU/Linuxtag&quot;. I mention this to show
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> his commitment about this point.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> But language and also expressions are a living thing. Today everybody
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> is aware that &quot;Linux&quot; stands for the whole package while &quot;kernel&quot; is
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the current expression for the &quot;real&quot; Linux and everything else are
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> tools and apps, where the GNU tools are just one part. What we now
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> call &quot;Linux&quot; is far more than what RMS claims, it is not just
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> GNU/Linux. It is also Mozilla/Linux, OpenOffice.org/Linux, etc.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> My personal opinion on that: to really be correct we have no other way
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> to use either &quot;Linux&quot; or use [all tools and applications]/Linux, which
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> would be ridiculous.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I agree with wobo. In English, and, I think, in many other modern
+</I>&gt;<i> languages, the meaning of a word is determined by common usage and not
+</I>&gt;<i> by what technical experts think it should mean.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> The Oxford Dictionary, which (eventually) reflects common usage, and is
+</I>&gt;<i> the nearest we have to a definitive source in English, defines Linux as:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;an open-source operating system modelled on UNIX.&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;Political in-correctness&quot; often results from failure to recognise the
+</I>&gt;<i> changing meanings/connotations of words.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Jim
+</I>
+I also agree with wobo.
+If you _really_ want to be totally correct, you should also include &quot;the
+Gnu implementation of the posix/unix standard&quot;, which gets even more
+obscure. It is a bit like the &quot;free&quot; vs &quot;open source&quot; argument, which
+even Stallman (a proponent of &quot;free&quot;) admits that they refer to the same
+thing.
+Note that there are similar nuances with the meaning of &quot;Mozilla&quot; -
+which the Mozilla foundation wisely accepts.
+
+my 2 cents :)
+--
+Andr&#233;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003841.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003839.html">[Mageia-discuss] Linux is a KERNEL not an OS
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3834">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3834">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3834">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3834">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>