diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101208/003186.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101208/003186.html | 115 |
1 files changed, 115 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101208/003186.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101208/003186.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..97d250e37 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101208/003186.html @@ -0,0 +1,115 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTincHWtzsdrWb1ucmnGnj_LMjaACeBcAP1SNkULh%40mail.gmail.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003185.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003187.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo</H1> + <B>Romain d'Alverny</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTincHWtzsdrWb1ucmnGnj_LMjaACeBcAP1SNkULh%40mail.gmail.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo">rdalverny at gmail.com + </A><BR> + <I>Wed Dec 8 22:41:59 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003185.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003187.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#3186">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#3186">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#3186">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#3186">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 22:17, Hoyt Duff <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">hoytduff at gmail.com</A>> wrote: +><i> I can see your point, but I feel that it's an elitist and +</I>><i> counter-productive approach to take. If the Mageia community wants +</I>><i> true community participation, they should structure things to +</I>><i> encourage rather than discourage participation.. +</I> +Definitely, yes. + +We're learning. Here we expected more on spontaneous participation to +structure itself around what we provided, but it may have been not +enough*. Opinions obviously diverge here, great. + +Let's admit that we don't perceive this the same way. It's not a +matter of being elitist or not, it's a matter of perception and the +balance is somewhere around this. So let's find a better ground from +that. + +* looking back, I think that's somehow what did not work as well in +the MDV Assembly MUGs thing. + +><i> And again I ask, If the guidelines were so bloody important, why were +</I>><i> non-compliant submissions even considered? +</I> +Flexibility for some proposals, in the hope authors would notice the +update here (see below) and act upon it spontaneously. Reading your +POV, it failed. But some did react as we expected. + +><i> And if they were important, +</I>><i> then the extra work was necessary. And really, how hard is it to send +</I>><i> the same email to a bunch of people? +</I> +As said before about this, we expected those very people to be +subscribed to this list; which was obviously a bit too naive guess. Or +not. Again, that's a perception thing. + +I guess we still did good: we did get to something great to start +with; before that, some people did follow quite strictly our +guidelines, posted updates; some posted many, many proposals; +discussions happened, on subjective and objective grounds; and, we did +arrive to something. We still can do reasonably better next time for +similar thing. Now, how would we improve the process? + + - have some submission tool that better catalogs proposals/authors +and helps notifying for sure all of them? (and assist for centralized +comments, etc.); we don't have it, had no time to build this to manage +something that already started, so we used what was quickly available +and good enough (Flickr, mailing-list, direct comments, tag-based +lists, epoll); until now, it's still kind of a one-time need; + - manually do the above? (we could, had we perceived it better or had +we more time to devote to this too); + - something else? + - realize that, in the end, it's both how you do it according to +basic needed steps, and how you react to context. + +Thanks for your ideas. + +Cheers, + +Romain +</PRE> + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003185.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003187.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#3186">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#3186">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#3186">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#3186">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |