diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101105/002898.html')
-rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101105/002898.html | 120 |
1 files changed, 120 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101105/002898.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101105/002898.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a91abb7d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101105/002898.html @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%20for%20the%20ISO&In-Reply-To=%3C4CD36803.3080003%40laposte.net%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002897.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002919.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO</H1> + <B>andre999</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions%20for%20the%20ISO&In-Reply-To=%3C4CD36803.3080003%40laposte.net%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO">andr55 at laposte.net + </A><BR> + <I>Fri Nov 5 03:12:19 CET 2010</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002897.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002919.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2898">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2898">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2898">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2898">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>><i> +</I>><i> Le 2010-11-02 08:02, Tux99 a écrit : +</I>>><i> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Frank Griffin wrote: +</I>>><i> +</I>>>><i> Tux99 wrote: +</I>>>>><i> On Mon, 1 Nov 2010, Frank Griffin wrote: +</I>>>>>><i> Weak point: +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>>><i> Unless you are prepared to do full intensive QA on the updated +</I>>>>>><i> distro, +</I>>>>>><i> the quality of these updated ISOs can be significantly lower than the +</I>>>>>><i> quality of the original release ISO. Since it will look, for all +</I>>>>>><i> intents and purposes, like the release ISO, that level of quality +</I>>>>>><i> will +</I>>>>>><i> be what people expect of it. +</I>>>>>><i> +</I>>>>><i> Nonsense. The normal updates are not any more unstable than the +</I>>>>><i> original +</I>>>>><i> release, rather the contrary. +</I>>>><i> I suggest you review MDV's release procedures. Full releases and +</I>>>><i> security updates go through formal QA. Backports are often not even +</I>>>><i> tested by the person building the rpm. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Backports? Who is talking about backports? +</I>>><i> We are talking about normal security and bug-fix updates here. +</I>If one selects "all updates" in Rpmdrake, it includes backports, if such +repositorys are enabled. + +>>><i> And they get addressed through updates which themselves go through QA. +</I>>><i> +</I>>><i> Exactly, that's why it make sense to release an updated iso with them +</I>>><i> included. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Agreed, we are not talking about backports at all. This issue is about +</I>><i> giving out an ISO disk with all official updates (to that date) to +</I>><i> people who cannot have their slow telephone hookup tied up for the day +</I>><i> to download our Mageia product or to user who have no hookup to the +</I>><i> internet at all. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Surely, the official updates have been thoroughly tested just as the +</I>><i> original release? It not, then a warning should be put out to +</I>><i> users/members that the official updates do not have the same level of +</I>><i> QA as the original release. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Marc +</I> +Even bugfixes often have errors. Many times I've seen bugfixes of +bugfixes, and sometimes bugfixes of bugfixes of bugfixes. (If you read +the description.) +If we go for incremental rpms (very much smaller), the only advantage I +see is for those without Internet connexion. +In that case, they wouldn't likely be vulnerable to security problems. + So that leaves (other) bugfixes. +This is something that I think, for the time being at least, can be best +adressed on an individual or local community basis. + +- André + +</PRE> + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002897.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002919.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions for the ISO +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#2898">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#2898">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#2898">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#2898">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |