summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html259
1 files changed, 259 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1a20b7e16
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000710.html
@@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BCooker%5D%20Re%3A%20Transparency%20%26%20open%20invitation%20to%0A%20a%20united%20foundation..%3F%20%5BWas%3A%20forking%20mandriva%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DxXyQ%2B4GRyBbqdRNM40yhVePJvBWejd_fKedPU%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000679.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000713.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]</H1>
+ <B>Per &#216;yvind Karlsen</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BCooker%5D%20Re%3A%20Transparency%20%26%20open%20invitation%20to%0A%20a%20united%20foundation..%3F%20%5BWas%3A%20forking%20mandriva%5D&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DxXyQ%2B4GRyBbqdRNM40yhVePJvBWejd_fKedPU%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]">peroyvind at mandriva.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Sep 22 18:09:10 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000679.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000713.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#710">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#710">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#710">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#710">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>2010/9/22 Jerome Quelin &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">jquelin at gmail.com</A>&gt;:
+&gt;<i> On 10/09/21 21:49 +0200, Per &#344;yvind Karlsen wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; You will leave your newborn in the &quot;hands&quot; of the same company whose
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; lack of direction caused this situation?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Maybe I'm a &quot;little&quot; paranoid, but i think we should listen
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; ex-employes / developers. They know the sh*t from the very inside.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Ah, yes, two ex-employees / developers which were actively involved
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> with the development of the distribution over so many years.. Uh, oh,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> wait, no they weren't.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I'm questioning whether they actually grasp all of the work required
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> to put together a distribution. I also find it odd when I see
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> statements from them on IRC which seems to be in conflict with others
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> involved with this that they intend on going in a different direction
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> independent of Mandriva. With all the people being brought aboard with
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Mageia from the Mandriva Linux community, I find it hard to believe
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> that there has been established a consensus about this with all of the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> people involved and that they really want to do everything on their
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> own and not care about keeping relations or anything with what they've
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> been involved with on actual community basis and over longer times
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> than either of these two..
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> since you were not part of the discussion*s*, what you believe doesn't
+</I>&gt;<i> really matter. i can tell you that there is a consensus to release a
+</I>&gt;<i> community distribution. in fact, it was more of a consensus: it was the
+</I>&gt;<i> stated goal around which the rest of the project was born.
+</I>Interesting fact you point out there, why wasn't I part of it? Why was
+I excluded?
+Given my history of being one of the oldest and most active
+contributors, part of the assembly and being the main person behind
+the foundation proposal back in 2007 and actively pursuing it since, I
+even brought in an offer from someone to fund it and proposed this to
+the same people behind this fork, around the same time as when they
+started discussing it, and I wasn't just ignored, I was even
+considered a threath.
+
+It seems to be rather obvious why I wasn't part of the discussions and
+was intentionally excluded, just as it illustrates that the discussion
+didn't really involve the whole community.
+
+I anyways don't see why anything I believe about Mageia is of any less
+relevance than what you believe about Mandriva.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Are you guys *really* planning on doing the whole distribution on your
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> own totally independent of Mandriva without any interest of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> collaborating?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> yes. period.
+</I>Your short, firm and decissive response to this obviously seems to
+lack any proper consensus or support from the community. Obviously you
+have something that you really need to work out..
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> To me, these responses of Romain and Nicolas seems to confirm all the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> questions I raised earlier in this thread, suggesting that the fork
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and their motivations are personal and not out of concern and care for
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the community, despite these motivations officially given. I guess
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> there's a reason for why they avoided these critical questions raised
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> towards them, and rather chose to attack constructive attempts at
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> doing what's in the best interest of the community in stead.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> i am just a contributor, who was part of the discussions before the
+</I>&gt;<i> launch of mageia. i am not a former mandriva/edge-it employee, but yet i
+</I>&gt;<i> totally agree with the various opinions stated here: currently, mandriva
+</I>&gt;<i> (the society) has failed to properly communicate with the community. &#160;we
+</I>&gt;<i> were never aware of what was going on, what were the plans, what were
+</I>&gt;<i> the goals, etc.
+</I>???
+This doesn't relate at all to what you're replying to.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> please take that into account, and the frustration it created.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> now, do you really think that mandriva's ceo coming and saying &quot;guys you
+</I>&gt;<i> are right, let's create something together&quot; is to be taken seriously?
+</I>It's a response to an invitation to create something together with and
+to interest of everyone. If it's your desire to create something like
+this already, why would you not be interested? What ulteriour motives
+do you think would be hidden behinds this? If it's not serious, then
+what are the consequences you'd be fearing when it's something that
+wouldn't make you dependent on it, but rather getting support from it?
+Worst case scenario would be to not get the support you didn't expect
+for creating something.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> so, for now, i think that mageia should start alone. it might be more
+</I>&gt;<i> difficult, but results will our owns, and what we'll manage to do from
+</I>&gt;<i> this situation. and if mandriva is really gueniously interested in a
+</I>&gt;<i> foundation, it will do whatever is needed to make sure mageia succeeds.
+</I>&gt;<i> in one year from now, we'll have a better view on what's going on, and
+</I>&gt;<i> if mandriva favors a real, independent community mentality (not to
+</I>&gt;<i> mention the fact that nerves will have settle).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> that is: we will judge mandriva for what it's doing, not it's saying.
+</I>&gt;<i> facts, not words.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> But sure, I've only been actively involved with the development of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> this *community* distribution and on several other levels for a decade
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> now, being amongst those involved for the longest time, while also
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> being an ex-employee myself, I've primarily been active through the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> community independent of my employment nor imposing personal feelings
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> towards company on the community. And I can also truly claim that I
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> have an absolute full understanding of all the work an complexity
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> involved in putting together the whole distribution and put tons of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> more hours into this on my sparetime and out of interest for
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> contributing to the community, making me quite aware of the fact that
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> you'll have a pretty darn hard time doing this and organizing the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> whole thing on your own.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> good for you.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> but you know, this is a fork - we announced *our* decision, and people
+</I>&gt;<i> join *if*they*want*. i did not handle a gun over people to force them to
+</I>&gt;<i> come on various mageia mailing-lists and propose their help. it was
+</I>&gt;<i> their choice. you may not agree, but please respect their choice. same
+</I>&gt;<i> as i respect your choice: you prefer continuing with mandriva, fine. and
+</I>&gt;<i> i won't come and try to convince you over and over: we're grown-ups, and
+</I>&gt;<i> can make our opinion ourselve.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> In all these claims about this being a community project and it being
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> independent off people's employment and all, would you really find
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> disgruntled ex-employees which has only been involved in this project
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> through employment as the most trustworthy characters? How much time
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> do they actually plan to invest themself into this project on their
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> sparetime now that they're not employed by Mandriva?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> this is none of your business. really.
+</I>&gt;<i> they will speak about that if they want, but otherwise, please stay away
+</I>&gt;<i> from their private life.
+</I>Questioning people's involvement and dedication to a project is to dig
+into people's personal life?
+Do you have a &quot;don't ask, don't tell&quot; policy for Mageia..?
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I can't really start telling how provoked I am over seeing this
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> childish and truly community hostile attitude, or about the claims
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> about through the liquidation of Edge-IT all of the talents and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> important people involved in development of the distribution
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> disappearing, guess what, the majority of the staff working on the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> distribution for quite some time has actually been employed at
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Conectiva, not Edge-IT!
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> once again: if you think it's better to follow up mandriva, then please
+</I>&gt;<i> do so. what we did was community-friendly: after having understood that
+</I>&gt;<i> a reconciliation could not be done at this moment, it's way better to
+</I>&gt;<i> say &quot;good-bye, we're going on our own&quot;, rather than rotting and
+</I>&gt;<i> spreading bad will / mood in the project.
+</I>I could say something about the order of occurence on &quot;good-bye,
+we're going on our own&quot; and &quot;spreading bad will / mood in the
+project&quot;, but whatever..
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> and who knows, maybe there will be a reconciliation later on. but i can
+</I>&gt;<i> tell you that it's not possible right now. trying to force a
+</I>&gt;<i> reconciliation won't work - it doesn't work like that.
+</I>Forcing? It was a constructive discussion and invitation which
+oviously is of interest to all parties, the opposition and rejection
+from some people within your project seems to go right against much of
+the motivation and goals for others involved with it.
+But sure, deciding on and any participation in this is something
+that's for you to decide on *together* with the rest of your
+community.
+
+I don't plan on ending the discussion nor trying to collaborate as
+much as possible..
+
+--
+Regards,
+Per &#216;yvind
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000679.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000713.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#710">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#710">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#710">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#710">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>