summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html210
1 files changed, 210 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..29c7438ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100922/000655.html
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BCooker%5D%20Re%3A%20Transparency%20%26%20open%20invitation%20to%0A%09a%20united%20foundation..%3F%20%5BWas%3A%20forking%20mandriva%5D&In-Reply-To=%3C201009221035.46188.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="000645.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="000659.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]</H1>
+ <B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20%5BCooker%5D%20Re%3A%20Transparency%20%26%20open%20invitation%20to%0A%09a%20united%20foundation..%3F%20%5BWas%3A%20forking%20mandriva%5D&In-Reply-To=%3C201009221035.46188.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]">stormi at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Sep 22 10:35:46 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000645.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000659.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#655">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#655">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#655">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#655">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>
+Le mercredi 22 septembre 2010 05:24:22, Olav Dahlum a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On 21/09/10 20:46, Jostein Hauge wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Tysdag 21. september 2010 19.30.31 skreiv nicolas vigier:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; On Tue, 21 Sep 2010, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; I still think that we must do it. In such a foundation, Mandriva (the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; company) would be a voice among others.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Well...
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;From my point of view (which I may share or not with many people from
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; the pre-board team who can confirm/contradict me here):
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; 1. I don't trust Mandriva existing and coming management, neither
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; investors. Years spent over there as an employee, seeing things from
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; the inside taught me that this company is, sadly, structurally broken,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; from the very top (investors) down to management and its practices -
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; and for quite some time. Fixing it is an option, although very costly
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; and requiring exceptionnal skills and commitment from management; I
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; don't see this over there at this time.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; 2. Mandriva plans are non-existent at this time to me (yesterday's
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; blog post is empty to me).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I completly agree with this.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I don't want to have anything to do with current Mandriva management
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; anymore, I've lost any trust in them.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Nicolas
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Please don't hold the Mandriva community hostage because of personal bad
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; feelings you might have about the Mandriva company.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; If Lapr&#233;vote invites to collaboration to make a foundation, then this should
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; be looked into regardless of your personal feelings. I think most of us would
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; love a solution like Fedora-Redhat.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; The name Mageia and the foundation might be kept. But what good does it make
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; to have a new Cooker, new build system or bugzilla? If collaboration between
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Mandriva and Mageia is possible, then please collaborate.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; When someone reach out a hand, don't turn your back on it. Instead you could
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; indicate what you think would be needed in order to make collaboration
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; possible. Just saying 'no I wont collaborate at all' makes this look more like
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; a vendetta than a constructive initiative.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Maybe this was a bit too harsh, but I guess you get the point :)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; - Jostein Hauge (jess)
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; _______________________________________________
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Mageia-discuss mailing list
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">Mageia-discuss at mageia.org</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Well, I will second to put aside certain differences for the benefit of
+</I>&gt;<i> the community and create a stable environment in which we can work.
+</I>&gt;<i> I see absolutely no problem with Mageia or Mandriva coexisting, and in
+</I>&gt;<i> the process share as much infrastructure as possible to avoid doing it
+</I>&gt;<i> all over again.
+</I>&gt;<i> If we keep as much as we can of the infrastructure on community hands, I
+</I>&gt;<i> think this is feasible to achieve and it will secure the feedback loop
+</I>&gt;<i> into Mandriva we've missed from e.g PCLinuxOS. Also, a pure community
+</I>&gt;<i> based distribution is a great idea, as we're not always having the same
+</I>&gt;<i> goals as Mandriva S.A. Both would benefit from an arrangement like this.
+</I>&gt;<i> The community (Mageia) could serve the regular users, taking care of
+</I>&gt;<i> more personal needs and release a distro fitting these. And Mandriva
+</I>&gt;<i> could concentrate on becoming a direct competitor to Canonical and
+</I>&gt;<i> Redhat (possibly Novell or partners if they can work out the financial
+</I>&gt;<i> situation) and gain real foothold in the enterprise/SMB market. One of
+</I>&gt;<i> the prerequisites for this happen is of course that we acknowledge each
+</I>&gt;<i> others existence and collaborate. Meaning, we will all aid in the common
+</I>&gt;<i> development of Cooker, but be a completely independent entity from the
+</I>&gt;<i> company, making our own (community) decisions. But will still keep the
+</I>&gt;<i> good relations between us intact. So let's say Mandriva S.A funds (on of
+</I>&gt;<i> the donators, etc) the foundation which creates Mageia and thus securing
+</I>&gt;<i> their own interests through keeping the community alive, compensated for
+</I>&gt;<i> their contributions (which is very important to remember!). We'll leave
+</I>&gt;<i> if the situation is unsatisfactory (remember, we're highly independent
+</I>&gt;<i> people) and if a FLOSS project lacks the community it's doomed, so
+</I>&gt;<i> keeping us happy is the key to success. All this current pickering
+</I>&gt;<i> between former employees and current ones is just stupid and will damage
+</I>&gt;<i> both. So I say, let's call for a truce and work together in advocating
+</I>&gt;<i> FLOSS software.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+I second that.
+
+Most agree that Mageia's destiny must now be in the hands of the community, and not depend on a company. Yes, but if said company is ready to act as a member of the community (like any of us but with maybe more means), and contribute to the project + do whatever it wants from the free distribution (corporate desktop, MDS, OEM products or anything else), then it's a win-win.
+
+And I pray again the former Edge-IT employees to avoid simply saying &quot;I don't want to have anything to do with Mandriva&quot;, but rather the more nuanced &quot;I don't want Mageia to depend on Mandriva&quot; !
+
+Na&#239;ve point of view of mine ?
+
+Regards
+
+Samuel Verschelde
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000645.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000659.html">[Mageia-discuss] [Cooker] Re: Transparency &amp; open invitation to a united foundation..? [Was: forking mandriva]
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#655">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#655">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#655">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#655">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>