summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment-0001.html122
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html122
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment-0001.asc7
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment.asc7
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment-0001.html27
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment.html27
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment-0001.html45
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment.html45
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment-0001.mht99
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment.mht99
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment-0001.asc7
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment.asc7
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment-0001.asc7
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment.asc7
14 files changed, 628 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fad5bcf08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+Hi,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:29 AM, andre999 <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:andre999mga@laposte.net" target="_blank">andre999mga@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
+
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Jehan Pagès a écrit :<br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+Hi,<br>
+<br><div class="im">
+On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, PhilippeDidier<br></div><div><div class="h5">
+&lt;<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@laposte.net</a> &lt;mailto:<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@<u></u>laposte.net</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
+
+
+<br>
+    Jehan Pagès a écrit :<br>
+     &gt; Hi,<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I noticed we propose only the Jack2 package, but no Jack1. Yet<br>
+    Jack2 is<br>
+     &gt; simply another implementation in C++ of the Jack protocol, and not a<br>
+     &gt; newer version (as the official website also states clearly:<br>
+     &gt; <a href="http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2" target="_blank">http://trac.jackaudio.org/<u></u>wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2</a> ).<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; Plus I had a very annoying bug with Ardour when using Jack2, and<br>
+    people<br>
+     &gt; on Ardour mailing list told me it was a known issue with Jack2 (both<br>
+     &gt; Ardour and Jack2 were installed from the Mageia 2 packages). I<br>
+    compiled<br>
+     &gt; Jack1, and it indeed fixed the issue.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; So I am thinking on proposing a spec for Jack1.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; But then I have questions:<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; 1/ How should I name this package? The jack2 package is named<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot;<br>
+     &gt; and I have no idea where you got that from (I guess this is a shorter<br>
+     &gt; name for &quot;Jack Audio Connection Kit&quot;, but should we really change<br>
+     &gt; package names this way?<br>
+     &gt; It is not that long). The official alternative<br>
+     &gt; name of Jack2 is &quot;jackdmp&quot; (see README here:<br>
+     &gt; <a href="https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2" target="_blank">https://github.com/jackaudio/<u></u>jack2</a> ). I saw nowhere else this<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot;<br>
+     &gt; naming.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+    We inherit this from Mandrake : in the early years of Mandrake a jack<br>
+    package already existed but it had nothing to do with JACK (Jack Audio<br>
+    Connexion Kit) : it was a console frontend for cd rippers, still<br>
+    provided in Mageia...<br>
+<br>
+    When JACK was imported into Mandrake it had to be given an other name...<br>
+    so jackit !!!<br>
+    There was a tonic controversy on Mandrake forum about this in 2003 or<br>
+    2004 year.<br>
+    Mandrake and then Mandriva and and then Mageia are the only<br>
+    distributions calling JACK package &quot;jackit&quot; ....<br>
+     &gt; So I am questioning the naming of this existing package, and<br>
+    would like<br>
+     &gt; to propose some rename along with a new name for a Jack1 package.<br>
+     &gt; Maybe simply &quot;jack1&quot; and &quot;jack2&quot;? Or &quot;jack&quot; and &quot;jackdmp&quot;?<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; 2/ How should the virtual dependency be named?<br>
+     &gt; The existing &quot;jackit&quot; spec provides a &quot;jackit-devel&quot; and a<br>
+    &quot;libjack-devel&quot;.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I think that none of the names are really fit IMO. First jackit<br>
+    for the<br>
+     &gt; same reason as before (I don&#39;t see where this name comes from), also<br>
+     &gt; libjack (and the -devel suffix) because this kit is not *only* a<br>
+    library<br>
+     &gt; (there are also the jackd daemon, tools, etc.).<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I propose simply &quot;jack&quot; as virtual package name.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; How does this sound?<br>
+     &gt; Thanks.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; Jehan<br>
+    Not simple because of this context ...<br>
+    If you want to call JACK jack you need to remove first the existing jack<br>
+    from the repo, and to modify the spec for every package requiring jackit<br>
+    now, to make them require jack if it is the new package name for JACK .<br>
+<br>
+    Post Scriptum : Reading this I don&#39;t know if my explanation  is clear<br>
+    enough ...<br>
+    A key to understand what I wrote :<br>
+    &quot;jack&quot; is the name of a package (whatever its content is)<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot; is the name of a package<br>
+    &quot;JACK&quot; is the recursive acronym (Jack Audio Connexion Kit) of the<br>
+    software you are talking about<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+Ok I understood the deal.<br>
+I would personally prefer even a longer package name like<br>
+jack-audio-connection-kit. Mageia would gain from having clearer naming.<br>
+Especially if we add the Jack1 alternative.<br>
+<br>
+Now if this is a big deal, and it generates a controversy again, it is<br>
+not that a big deal. The question thus is: how do I call Jack1 package<br>
+then? And can I say that this new package &quot;Provides: jackit&quot; so that it<br>
+works as an alternative to Jack2 (for instance for Ardour)?<br>
+Thanks.<br>
+<br>
+Jehan<br>
+</div></div></blockquote>
+<br>
+why not give jack1 the name :<br>
+ &quot;jack1 - the Jack Audio Connection Kit 1&quot;<br>
+and modify the description to include :<br>
+ &quot;This is the original C implementation of the Jack Audio Connection Kit protocol (JACK).  It is under active development concurrently with jackit (JACK2)&quot;<br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>I&#39;ll do this like this, then, and propose a SPEC to my mentor, maybe today.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
+
+
+It might also be a good idea to modify the jackit description to indicate that it is concurrent to jack1 as well.<br>
+And maybe rename it to jack2, if it is not too complicated ?<br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>I guess the maintainer of this package will have to do this. I&#39;ll search for his email.<br>Thanks all.<br><br>Jehan<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
+
+
+We could always use provides to accommodate packages requiring JACK.<br>
+<br>
+Just some suggestions ...<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
+<br>
+-- <br>
+André<br>
+</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fad5bcf08
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/35eded3e/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+Hi,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 4:29 AM, andre999 <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:andre999mga@laposte.net" target="_blank">andre999mga@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
+
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Jehan Pagès a écrit :<br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+Hi,<br>
+<br><div class="im">
+On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:11 PM, PhilippeDidier<br></div><div><div class="h5">
+&lt;<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@laposte.net</a> &lt;mailto:<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@<u></u>laposte.net</a>&gt;&gt; wrote:<br>
+
+
+<br>
+    Jehan Pagès a écrit :<br>
+     &gt; Hi,<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I noticed we propose only the Jack2 package, but no Jack1. Yet<br>
+    Jack2 is<br>
+     &gt; simply another implementation in C++ of the Jack protocol, and not a<br>
+     &gt; newer version (as the official website also states clearly:<br>
+     &gt; <a href="http://trac.jackaudio.org/wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2" target="_blank">http://trac.jackaudio.org/<u></u>wiki/Q_differenc_jack1_jack2</a> ).<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; Plus I had a very annoying bug with Ardour when using Jack2, and<br>
+    people<br>
+     &gt; on Ardour mailing list told me it was a known issue with Jack2 (both<br>
+     &gt; Ardour and Jack2 were installed from the Mageia 2 packages). I<br>
+    compiled<br>
+     &gt; Jack1, and it indeed fixed the issue.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; So I am thinking on proposing a spec for Jack1.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; But then I have questions:<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; 1/ How should I name this package? The jack2 package is named<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot;<br>
+     &gt; and I have no idea where you got that from (I guess this is a shorter<br>
+     &gt; name for &quot;Jack Audio Connection Kit&quot;, but should we really change<br>
+     &gt; package names this way?<br>
+     &gt; It is not that long). The official alternative<br>
+     &gt; name of Jack2 is &quot;jackdmp&quot; (see README here:<br>
+     &gt; <a href="https://github.com/jackaudio/jack2" target="_blank">https://github.com/jackaudio/<u></u>jack2</a> ). I saw nowhere else this<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot;<br>
+     &gt; naming.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+    We inherit this from Mandrake : in the early years of Mandrake a jack<br>
+    package already existed but it had nothing to do with JACK (Jack Audio<br>
+    Connexion Kit) : it was a console frontend for cd rippers, still<br>
+    provided in Mageia...<br>
+<br>
+    When JACK was imported into Mandrake it had to be given an other name...<br>
+    so jackit !!!<br>
+    There was a tonic controversy on Mandrake forum about this in 2003 or<br>
+    2004 year.<br>
+    Mandrake and then Mandriva and and then Mageia are the only<br>
+    distributions calling JACK package &quot;jackit&quot; ....<br>
+     &gt; So I am questioning the naming of this existing package, and<br>
+    would like<br>
+     &gt; to propose some rename along with a new name for a Jack1 package.<br>
+     &gt; Maybe simply &quot;jack1&quot; and &quot;jack2&quot;? Or &quot;jack&quot; and &quot;jackdmp&quot;?<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; 2/ How should the virtual dependency be named?<br>
+     &gt; The existing &quot;jackit&quot; spec provides a &quot;jackit-devel&quot; and a<br>
+    &quot;libjack-devel&quot;.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I think that none of the names are really fit IMO. First jackit<br>
+    for the<br>
+     &gt; same reason as before (I don&#39;t see where this name comes from), also<br>
+     &gt; libjack (and the -devel suffix) because this kit is not *only* a<br>
+    library<br>
+     &gt; (there are also the jackd daemon, tools, etc.).<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; I propose simply &quot;jack&quot; as virtual package name.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; How does this sound?<br>
+     &gt; Thanks.<br>
+     &gt;<br>
+     &gt; Jehan<br>
+    Not simple because of this context ...<br>
+    If you want to call JACK jack you need to remove first the existing jack<br>
+    from the repo, and to modify the spec for every package requiring jackit<br>
+    now, to make them require jack if it is the new package name for JACK .<br>
+<br>
+    Post Scriptum : Reading this I don&#39;t know if my explanation  is clear<br>
+    enough ...<br>
+    A key to understand what I wrote :<br>
+    &quot;jack&quot; is the name of a package (whatever its content is)<br>
+    &quot;jackit&quot; is the name of a package<br>
+    &quot;JACK&quot; is the recursive acronym (Jack Audio Connexion Kit) of the<br>
+    software you are talking about<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+Ok I understood the deal.<br>
+I would personally prefer even a longer package name like<br>
+jack-audio-connection-kit. Mageia would gain from having clearer naming.<br>
+Especially if we add the Jack1 alternative.<br>
+<br>
+Now if this is a big deal, and it generates a controversy again, it is<br>
+not that a big deal. The question thus is: how do I call Jack1 package<br>
+then? And can I say that this new package &quot;Provides: jackit&quot; so that it<br>
+works as an alternative to Jack2 (for instance for Ardour)?<br>
+Thanks.<br>
+<br>
+Jehan<br>
+</div></div></blockquote>
+<br>
+why not give jack1 the name :<br>
+ &quot;jack1 - the Jack Audio Connection Kit 1&quot;<br>
+and modify the description to include :<br>
+ &quot;This is the original C implementation of the Jack Audio Connection Kit protocol (JACK).  It is under active development concurrently with jackit (JACK2)&quot;<br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>I&#39;ll do this like this, then, and propose a SPEC to my mentor, maybe today.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
+
+
+It might also be a good idea to modify the jackit description to indicate that it is concurrent to jack1 as well.<br>
+And maybe rename it to jack2, if it is not too complicated ?<br>
+<br></blockquote><div><br>I guess the maintainer of this package will have to do this. I&#39;ll search for his email.<br>Thanks all.<br><br>Jehan<br> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
+
+
+We could always use provides to accommodate packages requiring JACK.<br>
+<br>
+Just some suggestions ...<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
+<br>
+-- <br>
+André<br>
+</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment-0001.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment-0001.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4a190d61b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment-0001.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQmBVYT1rWTfpocyQRAnZ+AJwPiJ89SLQwNMo981oP+5Sc81iVQQCgqvq/
+BJWvhFcI7pY8QxxpSE7XM5Y=
+=iBY5
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4a190d61b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/9bf89ccc/attachment.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQmBVYT1rWTfpocyQRAnZ+AJwPiJ89SLQwNMo981oP+5Sc81iVQQCgqvq/
+BJWvhFcI7pY8QxxpSE7XM5Y=
+=iBY5
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fabf837f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+then please push rpmlint-mageia-policy into infra. Thanks.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/5 Thomas Backlund <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tmb@mageia.org" target="_blank">tmb@mageia.org</a>&gt;</span><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">04.11.2012 19:13, Funda Wang skrev:<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+We already have the similar problem in the period of mandriva, packages<br>
+with same names but different archs won&#39;t be deleted from repository.<br>
+Maybe somebody could check youri&#39;s code to fix this problem.<br>
+<br>
+As for the deps list, I think this page shows them all:<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/<u></u>cauldron/missing.html</a><br>
+<br>
+And, there are some packages cannot be uploaded due to rpmlint polciy<br>
+for filenames, which I cannot deal with :( Personally, I don&#39;t think we<br>
+should check package file list for restricted filenames.<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote>
+<br></div>
+Actually checking file lists is good as it catches some packaging bugs..<br>
+<br>
+If you need new exceptions, add them to the rpmlint-mageia-policy<br>
+package, and notify sysadmins of the need and we&#39;ll update it on<br>
+build infra.<br>
+<br>
+--<br>
+Thomas<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fabf837f3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/a67215aa/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+then please push rpmlint-mageia-policy into infra. Thanks.<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/5 Thomas Backlund <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:tmb@mageia.org" target="_blank">tmb@mageia.org</a>&gt;</span><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">04.11.2012 19:13, Funda Wang skrev:<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
+We already have the similar problem in the period of mandriva, packages<br>
+with same names but different archs won&#39;t be deleted from repository.<br>
+Maybe somebody could check youri&#39;s code to fix this problem.<br>
+<br>
+As for the deps list, I think this page shows them all:<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/<u></u>cauldron/missing.html</a><br>
+<br>
+And, there are some packages cannot be uploaded due to rpmlint polciy<br>
+for filenames, which I cannot deal with :( Personally, I don&#39;t think we<br>
+should check package file list for restricted filenames.<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote>
+<br></div>
+Actually checking file lists is good as it catches some packaging bugs..<br>
+<br>
+If you need new exceptions, add them to the rpmlint-mageia-policy<br>
+package, and notify sysadmins of the need and we&#39;ll update it on<br>
+build infra.<br>
+<br>
+--<br>
+Thomas<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d9fb4b96c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<div>We already have the similar problem in the period of mandriva, packages with same names but different archs won&#39;t be deleted from repository. Maybe somebody could check youri&#39;s code to fix this problem.<br></div>
+<div><br></div><div>As for the deps list, I think this page shows them all:</div><div><a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>And, there are some packages cannot be uploaded due to rpmlint polciy for filenames, which I cannot deal with :( Personally, I don&#39;t think we should check package file list for restricted filenames.</div>
+<div><br></div><div>Regards.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/4 PhilippeDidier <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi<br>
+To Funda<br>
+<br>
+I&#39;m always impressed by the huge work you do for Mageia...<br>
+<br>
+There&#39;s a little problem with ruby updates in Cauldron : as shikamaru is<br>
+always the official maintainer you may not be advertised of this :<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html</a><br>
+<br>
+indeed, in cauldron repository we have coexisting ruby-*-doc packages as<br>
+if the last update, with noarch suffix, has not obsoleted the last  old<br>
+version of some doc rpm which didn&#39;t have the noarch suffix:<br>
+for instance<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-3.mga3         remains besides<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-4.mga3.noarch<br>
+<br>
+Perhaps  sysadmin will have to remove  some ruby-*-doc rpm  if they<br>
+don&#39;t explicitely have mga3.noarch extension<br>
+<br>
+here is a list of few examples of rpm that have to be  removed in 586<br>
+and x86_64 repositories :<br>
+ruby-atk-doc-1.0.3-1.mga2<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-3.mga3<br>
+ruby-curb-doc-0.7.15-1.mga1<br>
+ruby-eventmachine-doc-0.12.10-3.mga1<br>
+<br>
+we can explore the whole repo or simply use<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html</a><br>
+to get the list<br>
+<br>
+Same for some other non doc rpms<br>
+ruby-em-http-request-0.3.0-1.mga1 remains besides<br>
+ruby-em-http-request-1.0.3-2.mga3.noarch<br>
+<br>
+Hope this will help to decrease the number of &quot;broken dependancies&quot; (at<br>
+least 60  will be resolved...)<br>
+<br>
+Regards to Funda and sysadmins<br>
+<br>
+Philippe<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d9fb4b96c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/c34b3d05/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<div>We already have the similar problem in the period of mandriva, packages with same names but different archs won&#39;t be deleted from repository. Maybe somebody could check youri&#39;s code to fix this problem.<br></div>
+<div><br></div><div>As for the deps list, I think this page shows them all:</div><div><a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/missing.html</a></div><div><br></div><div>And, there are some packages cannot be uploaded due to rpmlint polciy for filenames, which I cannot deal with :( Personally, I don&#39;t think we should check package file list for restricted filenames.</div>
+<div><br></div><div>Regards.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/11/4 PhilippeDidier <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:philippedidier@laposte.net" target="_blank">philippedidier@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi<br>
+To Funda<br>
+<br>
+I&#39;m always impressed by the huge work you do for Mageia...<br>
+<br>
+There&#39;s a little problem with ruby updates in Cauldron : as shikamaru is<br>
+always the official maintainer you may not be advertised of this :<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html</a><br>
+<br>
+indeed, in cauldron repository we have coexisting ruby-*-doc packages as<br>
+if the last update, with noarch suffix, has not obsoleted the last  old<br>
+version of some doc rpm which didn&#39;t have the noarch suffix:<br>
+for instance<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-3.mga3         remains besides<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-4.mga3.noarch<br>
+<br>
+Perhaps  sysadmin will have to remove  some ruby-*-doc rpm  if they<br>
+don&#39;t explicitely have mga3.noarch extension<br>
+<br>
+here is a list of few examples of rpm that have to be  removed in 586<br>
+and x86_64 repositories :<br>
+ruby-atk-doc-1.0.3-1.mga2<br>
+ruby-BlueCloth-doc-2.2.0-3.mga3<br>
+ruby-curb-doc-0.7.15-1.mga1<br>
+ruby-eventmachine-doc-0.12.10-3.mga1<br>
+<br>
+we can explore the whole repo or simply use<br>
+<a href="http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html" target="_blank">http://check.mageia.org/cauldron/shikamaru/dependencies.html</a><br>
+to get the list<br>
+<br>
+Same for some other non doc rpms<br>
+ruby-em-http-request-0.3.0-1.mga1 remains besides<br>
+ruby-em-http-request-1.0.3-2.mga3.noarch<br>
+<br>
+Hope this will help to decrease the number of &quot;broken dependancies&quot; (at<br>
+least 60  will be resolved...)<br>
+<br>
+Regards to Funda and sysadmins<br>
+<br>
+Philippe<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div><br></div>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment-0001.mht b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment-0001.mht
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cca189682
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment-0001.mht
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+[From nobody Mon Nov 5 18:58:57 2012
+Return-Path: &lt;distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org&gt;
+X-Original-To: list-gnome@vitters.nl
+Delivered-To: list-gnome@vitters.nl
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org (menubar.gnome.org [209.132.180.169])
+ by bkor.dhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99565500371
+ for &lt;list-gnome@vitters.nl&gt;; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:43:08 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24EF75081D;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:07 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Original-To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Delivered-To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5477504E2;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -2.7
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=2
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id 10OvP6bVdjPE; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com
+ [209.85.216.47])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0697501D4;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:00 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t11so417431qaa.6
+ for &lt;multiple recipients&gt;; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
+ bh=2vANqCFSEA5xxD7prVZYVClbkH9eDunkyovslNTbtS0=;
+ b=S7s3wnY191eJFSmKbp30qwA+m8QdW57j/ReJhQ3m38KhTFCR0acHTyBWzjnbMU5UwN
+ 7f8o109Mi1wEpwShO+tjzXuVs9H69ncZGNS8Z/dk/S1jAEbRU+edHMcZQkziuihiQzv9
+ 6hNp3iOZNAt98pezJJUfIM/xQYcvyGDp1UYAZm/yGV7N2awNpQT6KdsZE6Hv9RHE4Dc0
+ RdVElwVw2rmZjDx3WcZNar886e1BpdaTzLuw9iyTKVDtD8wuxo5gwwUmbhmpq1EeugbY
+ yW+pdGq+GfxDSQ1+nYk18pP3+mn+eDo3Z3fvhjpaC03i7EoQom2+NiP6CaFRLIudpBLq
+ Iu5A==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.229.201.216 with SMTP id fb24mr3475527qcb.89.1352130179435;
+ Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.49.76.10 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:42:59 -0500
+Message-ID: &lt;CAFwd_vDmzG4JzOitajUrhWMviACw8mS9GkDUyvHDaiDXKE945Q@mail.gmail.com&gt;
+Subject: fallback mode
+From: Matthias Clasen &lt;matthias.clasen@gmail.com&gt;
+To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Cc: GNOME release team &lt;release-team@gnome.org&gt;
+X-BeenThere: distributor-list@gnome.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Discussion and collaboration list for distributors of GNOME
+ &lt;distributor-list.gnome.org&gt;
+List-Unsubscribe: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/options/distributor-list&gt;,
+ &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=unsubscribe&gt;
+List-Archive: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/&gt;
+List-Post: &lt;mailto:distributor-list@gnome.org&gt;
+List-Help: &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=help&gt;
+List-Subscribe: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list&gt;,
+ &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=subscribe&gt;
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Errors-To: distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org
+Sender: distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org
+
+I'm writing to inform you that the release team discussed
+https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features/DropOrFixFallbackMode
+yesterday. We've come to the conclusion that we can't maintain
+fallback mode in reasonable quality, and are better off dropping it.
+
+We're now working on organizing this so that it does not create more
+fallout than necessary. As part of this, I'm reaching out to our
+distributors to see what parts they care about. We haven't worked out
+a detailed plan for 3.8 tasks yet, but the feature page should give
+you a good idea about what things will be part of the 3.8 plan:
+
+- remove the 'forced fallback' ui in control-center
+
+- unify 'gnome can't run' and 'failwhale' UX
+
+- move background rendering entirely into gnome-shell; this is most
+likely to cause some problems for other environments that reuse g-s-d
+for background rendering. Splitting off the desktop-rendering
+functionality from nautilus is a separate issue, and does not
+necessarily have to happen for 3.8.
+
+Please watch the feature page for more details, as we work them out,
+and please contact us with your concerns. Lets work together and
+minimize the pain of this transition.
+
+Matthias, for the release team
+_______________________________________________
+distributor-list mailing list
+distributor-list@gnome.org
+https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list
+] \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment.mht b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment.mht
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..82483daec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d0495393/attachment.mht
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
+[From nobody Mon Nov 5 18:58:56 2012
+Return-Path: &lt;distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org&gt;
+X-Original-To: list-gnome@vitters.nl
+Delivered-To: list-gnome@vitters.nl
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org (menubar.gnome.org [209.132.180.169])
+ by bkor.dhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99565500371
+ for &lt;list-gnome@vitters.nl&gt;; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:43:08 +0100 (CET)
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24EF75081D;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:07 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Original-To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Delivered-To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5477504E2;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:04 +0000 (UTC)
+X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at gnome.org
+X-Spam-Flag: NO
+X-Spam-Score: -2.7
+X-Spam-Level:
+X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=2
+ tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
+ DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
+ SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
+Received: from menubar.gnome.org ([127.0.0.1])
+ by localhost (menubar.gnome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
+ with ESMTP id 10OvP6bVdjPE; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:01 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: from mail-qa0-f47.google.com (mail-qa0-f47.google.com
+ [209.85.216.47])
+ by menubar.gnome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0697501D4;
+ Mon, 5 Nov 2012 15:43:00 +0000 (UTC)
+Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t11so417431qaa.6
+ for &lt;multiple recipients&gt;; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
+ h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
+ bh=2vANqCFSEA5xxD7prVZYVClbkH9eDunkyovslNTbtS0=;
+ b=S7s3wnY191eJFSmKbp30qwA+m8QdW57j/ReJhQ3m38KhTFCR0acHTyBWzjnbMU5UwN
+ 7f8o109Mi1wEpwShO+tjzXuVs9H69ncZGNS8Z/dk/S1jAEbRU+edHMcZQkziuihiQzv9
+ 6hNp3iOZNAt98pezJJUfIM/xQYcvyGDp1UYAZm/yGV7N2awNpQT6KdsZE6Hv9RHE4Dc0
+ RdVElwVw2rmZjDx3WcZNar886e1BpdaTzLuw9iyTKVDtD8wuxo5gwwUmbhmpq1EeugbY
+ yW+pdGq+GfxDSQ1+nYk18pP3+mn+eDo3Z3fvhjpaC03i7EoQom2+NiP6CaFRLIudpBLq
+ Iu5A==
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Received: by 10.229.201.216 with SMTP id fb24mr3475527qcb.89.1352130179435;
+ Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+Received: by 10.49.76.10 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:42:59 -0800 (PST)
+Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:42:59 -0500
+Message-ID: &lt;CAFwd_vDmzG4JzOitajUrhWMviACw8mS9GkDUyvHDaiDXKE945Q@mail.gmail.com&gt;
+Subject: fallback mode
+From: Matthias Clasen &lt;matthias.clasen@gmail.com&gt;
+To: distributor-list@gnome.org
+Cc: GNOME release team &lt;release-team@gnome.org&gt;
+X-BeenThere: distributor-list@gnome.org
+X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
+Precedence: list
+List-Id: Discussion and collaboration list for distributors of GNOME
+ &lt;distributor-list.gnome.org&gt;
+List-Unsubscribe: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/options/distributor-list&gt;,
+ &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=unsubscribe&gt;
+List-Archive: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/archives/distributor-list/&gt;
+List-Post: &lt;mailto:distributor-list@gnome.org&gt;
+List-Help: &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=help&gt;
+List-Subscribe: &lt;https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list&gt;,
+ &lt;mailto:distributor-list-request@gnome.org?subject=subscribe&gt;
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;us-ascii&quot;
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
+Errors-To: distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org
+Sender: distributor-list-bounces@gnome.org
+
+I'm writing to inform you that the release team discussed
+https://live.gnome.org/ThreePointSeven/Features/DropOrFixFallbackMode
+yesterday. We've come to the conclusion that we can't maintain
+fallback mode in reasonable quality, and are better off dropping it.
+
+We're now working on organizing this so that it does not create more
+fallout than necessary. As part of this, I'm reaching out to our
+distributors to see what parts they care about. We haven't worked out
+a detailed plan for 3.8 tasks yet, but the feature page should give
+you a good idea about what things will be part of the 3.8 plan:
+
+- remove the 'forced fallback' ui in control-center
+
+- unify 'gnome can't run' and 'failwhale' UX
+
+- move background rendering entirely into gnome-shell; this is most
+likely to cause some problems for other environments that reuse g-s-d
+for background rendering. Splitting off the desktop-rendering
+functionality from nautilus is a separate issue, and does not
+necessarily have to happen for 3.8.
+
+Please watch the feature page for more details, as we work them out,
+and please contact us with your concerns. Lets work together and
+minimize the pain of this transition.
+
+Matthias, for the release team
+_______________________________________________
+distributor-list mailing list
+distributor-list@gnome.org
+https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/distributor-list
+] \ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment-0001.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment-0001.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c65e5ca0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment-0001.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQl8LmT1rWTfpocyQRAoR6AJ9es/JZbx9aS0iXC7Kbz8RQM/te/ACgvr9K
+2KkC9GS+32F1hxxlS0Qxj4Y=
+=J7Iy
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c65e5ca0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/d9f12acb/attachment.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQl8LmT1rWTfpocyQRAoR6AJ9es/JZbx9aS0iXC7Kbz8RQM/te/ACgvr9K
+2KkC9GS+32F1hxxlS0Qxj4Y=
+=J7Iy
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment-0001.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment-0001.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3d4edb531
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment-0001.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQlwyNT1rWTfpocyQRAitkAKCL+4lnBjhTTeZpQCUYroYyaHow/ACfZEy/
+yDTgaoOlEdysi1hXecK6vig=
+=G4ak
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment.asc b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment.asc
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3d4edb531
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20121105/ec39c5a1/attachment.asc
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
+
+iD8DBQBQlwyNT1rWTfpocyQRAitkAKCL+4lnBjhTTeZpQCUYroYyaHow/ACfZEy/
+yDTgaoOlEdysi1hXecK6vig=
+=G4ak
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----