diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment-0001.html | 19 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment.html | 19 |
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..02a284767 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/28 Thomas Backlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tmb@mageia.org" target="_blank">tmb@mageia.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> + +28.04.2012 16:55, Funda Wang skrev:<br> +<div><div class="h5">> Hello,<br> +><br> +> Could someboyd push blender 2.63 into cauldron? We currently have<br> +> 2.62, and 2.63 fixed a lot of bugs[1], please enhancement on BMesh<br> +> modelling system.<br> +><br> +> [1]: <a href="http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.63/Bug_Fixes" target="_blank">http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.63/Bug_Fixes</a><br> +<br> +</div></div>Pushed.<br> +<br> +--<br> +Thomas<br> +<br> +</blockquote></div><br>Hello,<br><br>I have just a question, what is the reason to compile Blender without the new engine render "cycles" ?<br>I tested the binary from the Blender site, and the cycles engine works fine, even though I haven't a video card "CUDA compatible"<br> + +<br>Regards,<br>Thibaut<br> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..02a284767 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120509/57f0e5b6/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/28 Thomas Backlund <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tmb@mageia.org" target="_blank">tmb@mageia.org</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> + +28.04.2012 16:55, Funda Wang skrev:<br> +<div><div class="h5">> Hello,<br> +><br> +> Could someboyd push blender 2.63 into cauldron? We currently have<br> +> 2.62, and 2.63 fixed a lot of bugs[1], please enhancement on BMesh<br> +> modelling system.<br> +><br> +> [1]: <a href="http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.63/Bug_Fixes" target="_blank">http://wiki.blender.org/index.php/Dev:Ref/Release_Notes/2.63/Bug_Fixes</a><br> +<br> +</div></div>Pushed.<br> +<br> +--<br> +Thomas<br> +<br> +</blockquote></div><br>Hello,<br><br>I have just a question, what is the reason to compile Blender without the new engine render "cycles" ?<br>I tested the binary from the Blender site, and the cycles engine works fine, even though I haven't a video card "CUDA compatible"<br> + +<br>Regards,<br>Thibaut<br> |