diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/023111.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/023111.html | 109 |
1 files changed, 109 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/023111.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/023111.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34a17529f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2013-February/023111.html @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN... + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Gnome%20mess%20in%20Mageia%20SVN...&In-Reply-To=%3C512A7F1E.2060907%40gmx.com%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="023089.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="023112.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN...</H1> + <B>Sebastian</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Gnome%20mess%20in%20Mageia%20SVN...&In-Reply-To=%3C512A7F1E.2060907%40gmx.com%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN...">sebsebseb_mageia at gmx.com + </A><BR> + <I>Sun Feb 24 21:59:10 CET 2013</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="023089.html">[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN... +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="023112.html">[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN... +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#23111">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#23111">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#23111">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#23111">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE> +><i> +</I>><i> Not to mention there is serious doubts the the 3.8.0 release +</I>><i> will be good enough to work properly for all endusers when the +</I>><i> fallback is dropped, so it would need atleast a update to 3.8.x +</I>><i> as a followup later to provide something that actually works, +</I>><i> wich comes back to lack of maintainers... +</I>><i> +</I> +I don't think Mageia providing GNOME 3.8 with the new classic mode made +using extensions, rather than the old fall back mode, would cause loads +of problems: <A HREF="http://worldofgnome.org/gnome-classic-not-classic-all/">http://worldofgnome.org/gnome-classic-not-classic-all/</A> + +Mageia doesn't have Unity for example which actually uses some things +from the fall back mode, and as a result I think Ubuntu 13.04 staying +with GNOME 3.6.2 rather than going 3.8 is a rather valid reason for them +to do so. + +Originally Mageia 3 was going to come out on March 20th, which caused an +issue all along when it came to what GNOME version it would be released +with, since GNOME 3.8 is scheduled for release on March 27th. However +then the release scheduled changed to April 2nd/3rd and then once again +to the 3rd of May. 3rd of May would actually provide enough time to get +a GNOME 3.8 point release or two in there as well, as long as Olav or +whoever is willing or able to package it does the work, and QA is +willing to test it properly for example. Well I joined QA myself to +test pre release ISO's with GNOME and such at times :). I know that in +general people from the QA team, are quite willing to test out GNOME +versions when it's time to test one, even if they don't personally use +GNOME as their DE of choice. + +Also KDE will be released with the latest stable final KDE version at +the time of Mageia 3's release, so why not GNOME aswell? Also I thought +that was the idea that both KDE and GNOME would get an exception for +version freeze, so that Mageia could be released with the latest stable +version at the time, of when the next Mageia version is going to be +released? + +Really the GNOME 3.8 proposal should be discussed again, and both myself +and someone else from the QA team, think that the next council meeting +which is scheduled for tommorow would be a good idea. Obviosuly Olav +should be in such a disucssion if one is going to happen in the council +or packagers meeting for example. + +Personally I think in general it's a bad thing to release a distro with +a over six months old version of a major upstream project such as GNOME +or KDE, unless there is a proper valid reason to do so, such as the +Ubuntu and Unity example. +</PRE> + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="023089.html">[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN... +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="023112.html">[Mageia-dev] Gnome mess in Mageia SVN... +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#23111">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#23111">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#23111">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#23111">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |