summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html226
1 files changed, 226 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4c5477b76
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-November/020011.html
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Fw: GPL-compatibility Question: Distributing Binaries of GPLed Programs Which Link Against Non-Free Code
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Fw%3A%20GPL-compatibility%20Question%3A%20Distributing%20Binaries%0A%20of%20GPLed%20Programs%20Which%20Link%20Against%20Non-Free%20Code&In-Reply-To=%3C20121116225916.251a83d7%40lap.shlomifish.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="020012.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="020017.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Fw: GPL-compatibility Question: Distributing Binaries of GPLed Programs Which Link Against Non-Free Code</H1>
+ <B>Shlomi Fish</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Fw%3A%20GPL-compatibility%20Question%3A%20Distributing%20Binaries%0A%20of%20GPLed%20Programs%20Which%20Link%20Against%20Non-Free%20Code&In-Reply-To=%3C20121116225916.251a83d7%40lap.shlomifish.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Fw: GPL-compatibility Question: Distributing Binaries of GPLed Programs Which Link Against Non-Free Code">shlomif at shlomifish.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Nov 16 21:59:16 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="020012.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release totem-3.6.3-2.mga3
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="020017.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release urpmi-7.10-1.mga3
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#20011">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#20011">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#20011">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#20011">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hi Aaron,
+
+I am forwarding your reply to the Mageia development mailing list.
+
+Regards,
+
+ Shlomi Fish
+
+Begin forwarded message:
+
+Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 11:55:12 -0500
+From: Aaron Williamson &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">aaronw at softwarefreedom.org</A>&gt;
+To: <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">shlomif at shlomifish.org</A>
+Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: GPL-compatibility Question: Distributing Binaries of
+GPLed Programs Which Link Against Non-Free Code
+
+
+Hi Shlomi,
+
+Below I've outlined the significant legal issues here. This is not legal advice:
+SFLC does not represent Mageia and I have not thoroughly reviewed the code at
+issue here to comprehensively understand its copyright and licensing structure.
+Rather, I have just identified the key issues based on the facts provided in
+your email and a quick visit to Cinelerra's website. Additionally, SFLC is a US
+legal services organization, and is not licensed to practice law in France, nor
+are we familiar with French copyright law. If you'd like, I'd be happy to refer
+you to a lawyer in Paris who is familiar with free software licensing issues.
+
+Our understanding of the linking issue comports with the Free Software
+Foundation's position: linking a GPL'd program with a program under another
+license results in a combined work based on both programs. The GPL requires that
+the resulting work be licensed under the GPL, and that no additional
+restrictions (besides those in the GPL) be placed on the work. Because the faac
+code is encumbered by the &quot;compliant implementations&quot; restriction, the
+combination would violate the GPL.
+
+That said, the linking question usually arises where a downstream user of a
+GPL-licensed work wants to link it with proprietary modules. If I understand
+your intention correctly, at least with regard to Cinelerra, you would not be
+introducing the incompatibility, i.e. Cinelerra already links to faac -- you
+would just be packaging and distributing both programs for Mageia. Is that
+accurate?
+
+If that's right, and Cinelerra is responsible for the violation of the license
+on its own software, it is difficult to imagine that they'd press the violation,
+or that a court would permit them to. Rather, it would seem that they intend the
+two programs to be used together and, even if they have not granted an explicit
+GPL exception allowing the combination, may have at least granted an implied
+license by distributing the combined work themselves.
+
+This analysis, however, assumes that the Cinelerra developers own all the
+copyrights in the GPL-licensed code within Cinelerra, and thus have the right to
+grant such an exception (implied or otherwise). If they have incorporated GPL'd
+code produced by third parties, who never licensed such a combination, into
+Cinelerra, then their use of faac can't provide their downstream users with any
+sort of comfort regarding the violation. You may wish to contact the Cinelerra
+developers and ask them to clarify who owns which portions of their codebase,
+and whether they intend for others to link their GPL'd code with faac.
+
+Best,
+
+--
+Aaron Williamson
+Senior Staff Counsel
+Software Freedom Law Center
+1995 Broadway, 17th Fl.
+New York, NY 10023
+(212) 461-1911 direct
+(212) 580-0898 fax
+www.softwarefreedom.org
+
+
+On 11/14/2012 06:00 PM, <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">help at softwarefreedom.org</A> wrote:
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> -------- Original Message --------
+</I>&gt;<i> Subject: Re: GPL-compatibility Question: Distributing Binaries of GPLed
+</I>&gt;<i> Programs Which Link Against Non-Free Code
+</I>&gt;<i> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:07:31 +0200
+</I>&gt;<i> From: Shlomi Fish &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">shlomif at shlomifish.org</A>&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> To: <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">help at softwarefreedom.org</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:17:00 -0500
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">help at softwarefreedom.org</A> wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 11/09/2012 12:23 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Dear Sir or Madam,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; I am writing you this letter on behalf of Mageia
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; ( <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/en/">https://www.mageia.org/en/</A> ), which is a community-developed, operating
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; system, based on the GNU/Linux system and with a free-and-open-source
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; (FOSS) core. We would like to ask whether (and how) we can distribute
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; pre-built packages of a GPLed program (in our case, the video editor
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; cinelerra) after it was linked to a library with some proprietary and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; non-GPLed code (in our case, faac).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; The longer story is that there has been some demand for including faac
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; ( <A HREF="http://sourceforge.net/projects/faac/">http://sourceforge.net/projects/faac/</A> - the Freeware Advance Audio
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Coder), which is both non-free in part and patent encumbered, in our
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; distribution, and to prepare versions of the appropriate packages for
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; which it is an optional dependency. These packages, such as cinelerra (
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; <A HREF="http://cinelerra.org/">http://cinelerra.org/</A> - a video editor), are licenced under
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; the GPL, which restricts which code its distributed binaries may be legally
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; linked to.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; So our question is: assuming we package faac as a package, can we still
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; provide pre-made and binary packages of GPLed programs that use it?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Furthermore, would this require receiving an explicit permission from the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; copyright owner of the program under the GPL?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; We would appreciate any advice that you can give to us on the matter.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Sincerely yours,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; &#8212; Shlomi Fish, on behalf of the Mageia development team.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The Software Freedom Law Center has received an email from you sent to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">help at softwarefreedom.org.</A> We look forward to helping you in any way we
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> can, but before we can do that we need to make sure that you understand
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> that your email to us does not create an attorney-client relationship
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> with us and any information you send us will not be considered
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> confidential or privileged. If you understand that, just reply to this
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> message by keeping the text of this paragraph and adding &quot;Understood&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> and we will respond to your email shortly. However, if your message
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> contains any information that you would like to be considered
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> confidential or privileged (in other words, you do not want it to be
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> considered public information), please respond to this message with
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;Delete my message&quot; or just &quot;Delete.&quot; We understand that this procedure
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> may seem burdensome, but it is required by law in order to ensure your
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> rights and the rights of our clients are protected.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Understood
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+
+--
+-----------------------------------------------------------------
+Shlomi Fish <A HREF="http://www.shlomifish.org/">http://www.shlomifish.org/</A>
+Escape from GNU Autohell - <A HREF="http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/autohell/">http://www.shlomifish.org/open-source/anti/autohell/</A>
+
+mplayer 0.9.999.2010.03.11-rc5-adc83b19e793491b1c6ea0fd8b46cd9f32e592fc is
+now available for download.
+ &#8212; Shlomi Fish and d3x.
+
+Please reply to list if it's a mailing list post - <A HREF="http://shlom.in/reply">http://shlom.in/reply</A> .
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="020012.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release totem-3.6.3-2.mga3
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="020017.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release urpmi-7.10-1.mga3
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#20011">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#20011">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#20011">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#20011">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>