summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html119
1 files changed, 119 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dac26693b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013713.html
@@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Removal%20of%20sun%20java&In-Reply-To=%3C4F757A45.2050901%40gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013709.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="013715.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java</H1>
+ <B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Removal%20of%20sun%20java&In-Reply-To=%3C4F757A45.2050901%40gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java">guillomovitch at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Mar 30 11:17:57 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013709.html">[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013715.html">[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13713">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13713">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13713">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13713">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le 30/03/2012 10:10, Thierry Vignaud a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On 30 March 2012 10:06, Guillaume Rousse&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">guillomovitch at gmail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> We can do like RH&amp; Ubuntu, provides an empty package that explain sun
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> doesn't enable us anymore to distribute it and that they've to install (&amp; update)
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> it manually from sun.com
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Why should we manage this case differently from other similar situations ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> That's not the first time we remove something from the distribution, because
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> it is not supported anymore usually, and has known available
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> vulnerabilities.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Actually, _YOU_ want us to &quot;manage this case differently from other similar
+</I>&gt;<i> situations&quot;.
+</I>&gt;<i> In case you didn't see, other packages are obsoleted by task-obsolete (if
+</I>&gt;<i> no better package)
+</I>Using task-obsolete is fine:
+- its purpose is crystal-clear
+- if I don't want it, I don't install it
+
+Adding an obsolete tag in openjdk to remove sun jdk now, for security
+concernes, whereas we had suffered a useless mess of at least four
+available java environnement at once for years uselessly (excepted for
+blindly applying jpackage project practices), doesn't seems quite similar.
+
+&gt;<i> In this case, we even have strong decisions to do so:
+</I>&gt;<i> 1) users don't report bugs in our bugzilla
+</I>&gt;<i> 2) users get aware it's no longer supported by us
+</I>&gt;<i> 3) users get aware they won't get any security update anymore
+</I>&gt;<i> 4) users get aware they have to look at sun.com for updates
+</I>&gt;<i> 5) ...
+</I>'user get aware' is a perfectly fine objective. 'users get managed
+automatically' is not.
+
+&gt;<i> So please don't invent special exceptions to our policies for
+</I>&gt;<i> your own comfort.
+</I>Get me a simple example of a similar situation, when a package A, after
+peacefully coexisting with package B for years, suddenly obsoleted it as
+B was removed from the distribution, for any kind of reason.
+
+And that's not really my own confort, as I don't have any java usage
+anymore. I really don't care about this specific package, I care about
+the limit between end user and packager for this kind of decision. If
+the global consensus here is toward enforcing operating system vendor
+choices, I'd rather not volonteer for for a role in the project...
+
+--
+BOFH excuse #337:
+
+the butane lighter causes the pincushioning
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013709.html">[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013715.html">[Mageia-dev] Removal of sun java
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13713">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13713">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13713">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13713">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>