summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html139
1 files changed, 139 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..98b23022d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-March/013553.html
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20How%20to%20proceed%20with%20seamonkey/iceape%20for%0A%20security%20updates%20and%20freeze%20push&In-Reply-To=%3C4F70AB90.4030701%40arcor.de%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="013549.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="013554.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push</H1>
+ <B>Florian Hubold</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5BRFC%5D%20How%20to%20proceed%20with%20seamonkey/iceape%20for%0A%20security%20updates%20and%20freeze%20push&In-Reply-To=%3C4F70AB90.4030701%40arcor.de%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push">doktor5000 at arcor.de
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Mar 26 19:46:56 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013549.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3800] (plog_init) enable perl_checker to check callers
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013554.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13553">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13553">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13553">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13553">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Hi all,
+
+i've taken a look at iceape and locally updated it to 2.7.2&#185; after talking with
+maintainer
+about it, with the intent to at least push this to Mageia 1, because since
+initial import
+it has not received any security updates (and there are countless security problem)
+I've also completed the rebrand to iceape as far as i saw fit (change URL to
+release
+notes, applied some more debian rebranding patches, removed updater files and
+updater menu item, and some more smaller fixes, current svn diff is attached)
+and did some cleaning of old and unused stuff.
+
+&#185;: I've only updated it to 2.7.2 as 2.8 does require newer NSPR, and that's a no-go
+for Mageia 1, which is my primary target.
+
+
+
+The biggest problem is: current maintainer does not have enough time to maintain
+it properly, and i'm not planning on doing it either, as i don't use it or know
+it well.
+
+There are at least 3 good options on how to proceed, apart from mga1 update:
+
+
+1.
+push latest version to cauldron, and hope somebody will maintain it afterwards
+(this is the worst IMHO, as we'll probably face the same situation with a de-facto
+umaintained package throughout Mageia 2 lifetime, which i want to avoid)
+
+
+2.
+drop iceape, package as seamonkey again and sync with Fedora
+(this one would at least make maintenance easier, only need to follow Fedora)
+
+
+3.
+drop iceape completely
+(actually this has the advantage that users can have official upstream binaries,
+and take advantage of automatic updates. Current maintainer agrees with this,
+as it's simply too fragile for him to maintain it easily.
+If somebody is against this, please step up as maintainer or help the current
+maintainer)
+
+
+I'm currently in contact with some seamonkey developers, to maybe clear up
+why/if the
+rebrand is needed, if it's needed like it's currently done, and why Fedora can
+simply
+ship seamonkey without the need for a rebrand, but the dialog may take some
+time, this
+would be only relevant for option 2.
+
+
+If nobody responds, i'll push my current work as security update for Mageia 1,
+and drop iceape from cauldron so that we won't have an outdated package and
+a potential security risk for Mageia 2.
+
+
+Kind regards
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="013549.html">[Mageia-dev] [soft-commits] [3800] (plog_init) enable perl_checker to check callers
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="013554.html">[Mageia-dev] [RFC] How to proceed with seamonkey/iceape for security updates and freeze push
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#13553">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#13553">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#13553">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#13553">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>