diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011645.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011645.html | 122 |
1 files changed, 122 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011645.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011645.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..312fb5a26 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011645.html @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RFC Package Naming Policy + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%20Package%20Naming%20Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C4F26E06C.3060009%40doc.ic.ac.uk%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011675.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011646.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] RFC Package Naming Policy</H1> + <B>Pierre-Malo Deniélou</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RFC%20Package%20Naming%20Policy&In-Reply-To=%3C4F26E06C.3060009%40doc.ic.ac.uk%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RFC Package Naming Policy">malo at doc.ic.ac.uk + </A><BR> + <I>Mon Jan 30 19:24:44 CET 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011675.html">[Mageia-dev] stardict 3.0.3 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011646.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC Package Naming Policy +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#11645">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#11645">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#11645">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#11645">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Dear all, + +Following some recent mix-up, some possible ambiguity was found in the +current policy with respect to package naming (as seen in +<A HREF="https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging_guidelines#Package_Naming">https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Packaging_guidelines#Package_Naming</A>). + +---------------------------------------------------------------------- +So currently it is written: +«* Name should be the upstream name of the software project, always +lowercase. +* When the package name is different to the project name, you should +define and use %{upstream_name} macro to refer to the original project +name within the spec +* ''Dash '-' must be used as the delimiter for name parts.'' +* ''Do NOT use an underscore '_', a plus '+', or a period '.' as a +delimiter.'' +* The spec file should be named using the %{name}.spec scheme, i.e. the +name of the package should be used as the name for the spec.» + +I propose to change it to the following: + +«* The base package names (used for svn and src.rpm) should be the +upstream name of the software project, always lowercase. Upstream names +can contain digits, '+', '_' or '.', but no other special characters. +Really exceptionally, uppercase letters can be allowed if there is +proper justification or historical reasons. +* Package names that are built by Mageia packagers from the upstream +name by adding suffixes should always use '-' as delimiter (e.g. +foo-devel or foo-plugins as derived from the foo package). All '_' and +'+' in package names must come from upstream naming! The '.' in package +names should only come upstream or standard versioning schemes. +* The spec file should be named using the %{name}.spec scheme, i.e. the +name of the source package and svn directory should be used as the name +for the spec.» + +--------------------------------------------------------------------- +Some of you may notice that the newly drafted policy allows upper-case +letters in packages as an exception (when justified). This is to follow +the current practice (which is not following the current policy, where +we have packages like R-base). +I don't want to raise a heated discussion (there was an inconclusive +discussion a long time ago on cooker [*]) about enforcing an all +lower-case policy. Not sure a consensus can be reached today, but +lower-casing package names should be the default for 99% of the packages +in Mageia. + +Any comments? Is it indeed clearer this way? Any other conditions on +package names we should add? + +Best regards, +-- +Malo + +[*] <A HREF="http://lists.mandriva.com/cooker/2006-03/msg03396.php">http://lists.mandriva.com/cooker/2006-03/msg03396.php</A> +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011675.html">[Mageia-dev] stardict 3.0.3 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011646.html">[Mageia-dev] RFC Package Naming Policy +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#11645">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#11645">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#11645">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#11645">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |