summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html135
1 files changed, 135 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5e919875a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011336.html
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOPHaVS6Vo3Awk7eCTfcK8aqyt6V89eX2N6CcPX%2BA3pd9%3DZSCQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011323.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011300.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1</H1>
+ <B>Christian Lohmaier</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3CCAOPHaVS6Vo3Awk7eCTfcK8aqyt6V89eX2N6CcPX%2BA3pd9%3DZSCQ%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1">lohmaier+mageia at googlemail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Jan 13 14:36:03 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011323.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011300.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11336">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11336">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11336">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11336">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:28 AM, andre999 &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">andre999mga at laposte.net</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> Christian Lohmaier a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Juan Luis Baptiste&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">juancho at mageia.org</A>&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &#160;wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Lohmaier
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">lohmaier+mageia at googlemail.com</A>&gt; &#160;wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Juan Luis Baptiste&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">juancho at mageia.org</A>&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> &#160;wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> [..]
+</I>&gt;<i> To make things entirely clear, the agreed base policy (in various meetings)
+</I>&gt;<i> was that updates should contain no new features. &#160;Thus in general, a
+</I>&gt;<i> (verified) bug fix only release from upstream would qualify as an update.
+</I>&gt;<i> This being subject to exceptions, which were later agreed on after much
+</I>&gt;<i> discussion.
+</I>
+Thanks - this is the first time this has been stated explicitly.
+
+&gt;<i> I don't really see the point of doing all this arguing about a wiki page
+</I>&gt;<i> that doesn't completely accord with update policy. &#160;We just have to fix the
+</I>&gt;<i> wiki page.
+</I>
+Well - if you don't bother whether your policies are correct, you
+should not bother to publish them in the first place but refer to
+&quot;whatever was discussed on the mailinglists&quot;.
+Yes, you have to fix the wiki page. But judging from this discussion
+people did not know what really is correct. The arguing is not about
+the wiki-page, but about the policy that is reflected by that wiki
+page.
+
+You did now clarify the policy as it should be, and that is fine. But
+please understand that the written policy did reflect a completely
+different picture.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> Yes, but this then changes the policy drastically (for the better, so
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> please change it)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It is not that drastic a change. &#160;The effect is essentially the same,
+</I>
+No, It is a drastic change from what is written. It probably is no big
+difference compared to what people actually do today, but the policy
+is changed drastically by this change.
+
+&gt;<i> although it is of course much easier -- and generally safer -- to apply a
+</I>&gt;<i> (verified) bug fix only release from upstream.
+</I>&gt;<i> As stated above, and mentioned by others posting to this thread, the wiki
+</I>&gt;<i> page does not accurately affect the policy.
+</I>
+Well, you might have a different interpretation of this thread, but I
+see people strongly supporting the policy as is written on the wiki,
+so it is far from clear.
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> And when I write &quot;whatever is against the policy&quot; - I'm referring to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> what is written in the wiki, not what people actually do.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Policy is what was agreed on, and not any errors that may exist in what is
+</I>&gt;<i> written in the wiki. &#160;We have corrected many similar errors in the wiki.
+</I>
+If things were so clear, than people could have written exactly what
+you did and not continue with this discussion for so long.
+
+&gt;<i> Calling your understanding of the policy &quot;stupid&quot; is not necessarily the
+</I>&gt;<i> most diplomatic approach.
+</I>
+Again: I did judge what is written in the wiki. When policies are
+published, I have no other choice than to assume that what is written
+reflects the policy that was discussed and decided upon.
+And while it might not be diplomatic, I for sure prefer people
+actually writing what they mean. I of course fully agree that just
+writing &quot;foo sucks&quot; without stating how foo could suck less is
+inappropriate/waste of time.
+
+But well - thanks for making a concrete statement of what the policy
+/actually/ is.
+
+ciao
+Christian
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011323.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011300.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing &quot;bugs&quot; for updating magia 1
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11336">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11336">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11336">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11336">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>