diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011271.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011271.html | 112 |
1 files changed, 112 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011271.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011271.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6dbb0c819 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-January/011271.html @@ -0,0 +1,112 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1 + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C201201121048.41289.bgmilne%40zarb.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011253.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011283.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1</H1> + <B>Buchan Milne</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20please%20stop%20doing%20%22bugs%22%20for%20updating%20magia%201&In-Reply-To=%3C201201121048.41289.bgmilne%40zarb.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1">bgmilne at zarb.org + </A><BR> + <I>Thu Jan 12 09:48:40 CET 2012</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011253.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011283.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#11271">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#11271">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#11271">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#11271">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Wednesday, 11 January 2012 22:10:01 Juan Luis Baptiste wrote: +><i> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>> wrote: +</I>><i> > Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 11:24 -0500, Juan Luis Baptiste a écrit : +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > So trusting and having bugs are totally unrelated. And if you doubt that +</I>><i> > bugs appear, just see our bugzilla. +</I>><i> > We trust upstream ( most of them ), and yet there is bugs. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> No, they're not totally unrelated when we don't have the man power to +</I>><i> do through QA on every package, we need to trust on the packager (and +</I>><i> upstream of course) that he did his best to test the new version +</I>><i> without expecting him to have tested all the new features, Or do you +</I>><i> expect that a QA member get a list of all the new features of a +</I>><i> backport and start testing them one by one ? that's what I call +</I>><i> unrealistic in practice. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> >> If you think that all version backports should be tested in the same +</I>><i> >> way as updates by QA, then all versions upgrades in cauldron should be +</I>><i> >> tested by QA before pushing them to the BS right ? +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > No, they should be tested before being put in the stable release. And +</I>><i> > that's exactly what we do by freezing and testing before release. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Of course but again, we can't test *all* the new features of *all* the +</I>><i> programs that are going to a new release, we do our best for most of +</I>><i> them. Critical components like installer, kernel, drak* tools, etc +</I>><i> need more testing and that's where (our very small team) QA should +</I>><i> spend their time after a freeze. The rest we have to do our best to +</I>><i> test after each version update of a package. +</I> +And this is IMHO why we should not necessarily enforce full QA on backports. + +It is ridiculous to enforce more testing on a package in backports, than most +likely was done for it while in cauldron before a release, especially +considering the user has a relatively easy mechanism for reverting to the +working package. + +If QA can state definitively that every package in a release is fully tested, +then I might agree. + +But, some of the reason to *have* backports is to allow users on stable +releases to test new versions that exist in cauldron. + +Regards, +Buchan +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011253.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1 +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011283.html">[Mageia-dev] please stop doing "bugs" for updating magia 1 +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#11271">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#11271">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#11271">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#11271">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |