summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html186
1 files changed, 186 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8a635c779
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-February/011912.html
@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3C4F3952F2.7040405%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="011911.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="011914.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2</H1>
+ <B>andre999</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%09task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2&In-Reply-To=%3C4F3952F2.7040405%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2">andre999mga at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Feb 13 19:14:10 CET 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011911.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011914.html">[Mageia-dev] Beta 1 isos
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11912">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11912">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11912">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11912">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Michael Scherer a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Le lundi 13 f&#233;vrier 2012 &#224; 10:35 +0100, Thierry Vignaud a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On 13 February 2012 10:05, Olav Vitters&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">olav at vitters.nl</A>&gt; wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - Suggests drakconf in minimal package
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Why as part of task-gnome*, shouldn't it be a require elsewhere?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 1) for symmetry with task-kde4-minimal
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> It should be done in task-{lxde,xfce,..} of course
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Then it should be documented, because currently, task-* is polluted.
+</I>&gt;<i> Since everybody add his pet peeves packages as task-*, that cause the
+</I>&gt;<i> same problem that was intended to solve, ie too much choice. People have
+</I>&gt;<i> the warm fuzzy feeling of having a selected and taylored set of rpm, but
+</I>&gt;<i> that's far from the truth.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+Right.
+
+&gt;<i> Also, it abuses suggests and interact in a weird way with auto-orphans
+</I>&gt;<i> ( or it should be better to say that it make it dangerous for users to
+</I>&gt;<i> use the feature, thanks to the lack of semantics for Suggests, coupled
+</I>&gt;<i> with lack of clear semantics on task-* and the abuse of the 2nd one by
+</I>&gt;<i> the first one coupled with a too simple UI ).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 2) so that people performing minimal install then installing task-foobar
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> got mcc too
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> (it's done at installer time through rpmsrate which is not used after
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> installation by urpmi -- else nothing will pull it[1])
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So basically, that's duplication of information ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 3) because that's the right place to do it
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Note it's a suggests, not a hard requires
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Suggests semantics are still unclear. For now, that's &quot;let me use this
+</I>&gt;<i> to push totally unrelated packages in the default setup because I think
+</I>&gt;<i> they should be installed but I have no way to explain why, and they are
+</I>&gt;<i> important but not important enough to be documented or selected at
+</I>&gt;<i> runtime&quot;. And that's far from being ideal.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+I have exactly the same impression.
+It gets messy to clean up unwanted packages.
+
+&gt;<i> In fact, the more I can think of, the more I wonder what was the problem
+</I>&gt;<i> we wanted to solve with Suggests, and if we really did. The UI is near 0
+</I>&gt;<i> and will be for a long time, since there isn't enough expressiveness in
+</I>&gt;<i> a rpm tag for that. Advanced users, who are concerned with deps and what
+</I>&gt;<i> is installed either remove suggests ( my case, because it pull lots of
+</I>&gt;<i> unneeded stuff ), or just do without it for finding related packages
+</I>&gt;<i> ( because you still need to look on why something is pulled, and you
+</I>&gt;<i> cannot really select ( not that asking a 100 questions would be good
+</I>&gt;<i> OTOH )).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Less advanced users do not care at all about suggests in the best case
+</I>&gt;<i> ( ie, it solved almost nothing for them ), and end with auto-orphans
+</I>&gt;<i> doing weird stuff. It also have a weird interaction model on upgrade
+</I>&gt;<i> ( like &quot;if task-kde4 is installed, do I want to also pull all suggests,
+</I>&gt;<i> even those I removed, or do I want to not do it, and then end with a
+</I>&gt;<i> different result than from a fresh installation&quot; )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So I would suggests ( no pun intended ) to just drop them. Keeping them
+</I>&gt;<i> make us diverge from upstream, afaik, requires various hack with some
+</I>&gt;<i> side effect and extra documentation for almost nothing ( ie, since we
+</I>&gt;<i> may not have solved a real problem ), and think to do think another way.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>This discussion reminds me of a model I'd like to see for task packages.
+Thinking of rpmdrake.
+Task packages show a tree of the packages to be installed.
+Each required package simply shows a link to its' description. (As one
+sees now for required packages.)
+Each suggested package package shows justifying description line, in
+addition to a link to its' description. And a check box to deselect the
+item, so it is not installed.
+
+So for example we wouldn't need a separate task-gnome and
+task-gnome-minimal, since task-gnome would have everything more than
+minimal as an option (or suggest).
+
+We would have to have some means to indicate suggests already installed,
+among other factors.
+
+Although I see this model as primarily useful for task packages, it
+could apply to any package with requires or suggests.
+The concept is not new, it at least used to exist in the Microsoft
+environment for larger packages.
+
+Just an idea :)
+
+--
+Andr&#233;
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="011911.html">[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release task-gnome-3.3.2-4.mga2
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="011914.html">[Mageia-dev] Beta 1 isos
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#11912">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#11912">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#11912">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#11912">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>