summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html117
1 files changed, 117 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cda979349
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2012-August/017896.html
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Library%20policy%20query%3A%20What%20do%20we%20do%20when%20SONAME%0A%20includes%20both%20major%20and%20minor%3F%20%28Re%3A%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%20kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3%29&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbjMgnjoGeWDVwUKWc3B8x-xGoakc0QKxoMaj-xtJ6r1%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="017895.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="017897.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)</H1>
+ <B>Pascal Terjan</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Library%20policy%20query%3A%20What%20do%20we%20do%20when%20SONAME%0A%20includes%20both%20major%20and%20minor%3F%20%28Re%3A%20%5Bchangelog%5D%20%5BRPM%5D%20cauldron%20core/release%0A%20kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3%29&In-Reply-To=%3CCA%2BCX%2BbjMgnjoGeWDVwUKWc3B8x-xGoakc0QKxoMaj-xtJ6r1%3Dw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)">pterjan at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Aug 2 11:11:52 CEST 2012</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017895.html">[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="017897.html">[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#17896">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#17896">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#17896">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#17896">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 10:01 AM, Balcaen John &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">mikala at mageia.org</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> Le jeudi 2 ao&#251;t 2012 09:28:28 Colin Guthrie a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> 'Twas brillig, and Christiaan Welvaart at 01/08/12 23:09 did gyre and
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> gimble:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; On Wed, 1 Aug 2012, Colin Guthrie wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I have to agree here that something is &quot;funny&quot; in the libattica package
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; which ultimately helped to contribute to this issue.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; e.g. on my system before update (tho' with similar results after):
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; [<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">colin at jimmy</A> ~]$ rpm -q --provides lib64attica0
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; libattica.so.0.3()(64bit)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; lib64attica0 = 0.3.0-1.mga2
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; lib64attica0(x86-64) = 0.3.0-1.mga2
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; [<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">colin at jimmy</A> ~]$ rpm -ql lib64attica0
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; /usr/lib64/libattica.so.0.3
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; /usr/lib64/libattica.so.0.3.0
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; So I can see how this mistake was made and TBH I could have made the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; same mistake myself (with the caveat that I likely would not have bumped
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; the version of someone else's package with out confirming first and that
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; it should have been obvious from testing and installing the build)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; But either way this seems like an issue to fix properly (possibly with
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; an upstream fix or some modification to the library policy when the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; minor version is &quot;presented&quot; like this).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Good catch! Of course it's never the library policy that's wrong. The
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; library major version is apparently 0.4 so the correct package name is
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; lib64attica0.3 for the previous one
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; lib64attica0.4 for the current one
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; ... in the specfile: %define attica_major 0.4
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; Can the maintainer of this package please fix this?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; To find the version to use, look up the 'soname' of the library. I use:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; readelf -a /usr/lib64/libattica.so.0.4|grep SONAME
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; =&gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; ... Library soname: [libattica.so.0.4]
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &gt; What follows &quot;.so.&quot; is the major version of the library.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Is that really the correct definition of what a &quot;major&quot; version is?
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> I always thought the major was just the first number.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The library policy certainly doesn't mention &quot;double digit majors&quot; or
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> similar.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Is this something upstream is doing deliberately or is it just an oversight?
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/attica/repository/revisions/master/entry/CMakeLists.txt">https://projects.kde.org/projects/kdesupport/attica/repository/revisions/master/entry/CMakeLists.txt</A>
+</I>
+Yet something includes the minor in the soname
+
+This leads to <A HREF="https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/2011-December/698438.html">https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/2011-December/698438.html</A>
+or it being flagged in debian by the package-name-doesnt-match-sonames
+lintian test.
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="017895.html">[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="017897.html">[Mageia-dev] Library policy query: What do we do when SONAME includes both major and minor? (Re: [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdelibs4-4.9.0-2.mga3)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#17896">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#17896">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#17896">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#17896">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>