summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html141
1 files changed, 141 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b46964d5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110524/004939.html
@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20slight%20security%20improvement%3A%20should%20we%20update%0A%20aria2%20to%201.11.2%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1105241358001.26733%40zem.cjw.nep%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004937.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="004931.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?</H1>
+ <B>Christiaan Welvaart</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20slight%20security%20improvement%3A%20should%20we%20update%0A%20aria2%20to%201.11.2%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Calpine.LMD.2.02.1105241358001.26733%40zem.cjw.nep%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?">cjw at daneel.dyndns.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Tue May 24 14:47:47 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004937.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004931.html">[Mageia-dev] Push request
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4939">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4939">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4939">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4939">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Tue, 24 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+
+&gt;<i> Le mardi 24 mai 2011 &#224; 12:45 +0200, nicolas vigier a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> On Tue, 24 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
+</I>
+&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> There is 2 proposal :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - filling them on security, and have a saved search
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - creating a tracker bug
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I would be in favor of the tracker bug :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - you can subscribe to it
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - it will be clearer ( as bugfixes are not security so we may miss some
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> update to do )
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - it doesn't pollute the list of saved search
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> But as pascal said, a tracker bug requires that each bug to be linked to
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> it, which is manual and error prone.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I don't know much about bugzilla, but:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> - Add a keyword 'security' to all security bugs.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> (also manual and error prone?)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> We already have a security component. Would a keyword instead of a
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> component be better for this ?
+</I>
+&gt;<i> What when we have more than 1 release ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I really think the security component is wrongly named. The bug is
+</I>&gt;<i> against a rpm package, be it a security or non security fix, and
+</I>&gt;<i> treating security fix differently than non security fixes add IMHO
+</I>&gt;<i> unneeded complexity to the process.
+</I>
+I agree with Michael: security is not a component: a security issue in a
+package is still a bug in that package. (And I still consider each source
+rpm a component like originally configured in the mandrake bugzilla).
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> It is also manual, but a keywork is easier to remember than a tracker
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> bug number.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> That's a good point, I guess we can either place the link on bugzilla
+</I>&gt;<i> main page, or use named bugs, or something like that ?
+</I>
+There is a 'version' in bugzilla, with only 'Cauldron' in it currently,
+maybe that should be used. Setting this (or a target milestone) for a bug
+is easy, just choose 'Mageia 1' from the list. So if you want to see all
+updates in the list, make a search for bugs with version (or target
+milestone) Mageia 1. A link on the main page would be fine with me. It's a
+trivial search, however (:
+
+&gt;&gt;<i> Maybe we can also think about a mailing list to receive all security
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> bugs.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It doesn't take non security related fix in account.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Given the fact that there is no difference between the way we treat them
+</I>&gt;<i> ( ie, it is updates ), and given the fact than even later the difference
+</I>&gt;<i> will be between embargoed updates and the rest, I guess that a generic
+</I>&gt;<i> list for issue affecting a stable release would be better suited.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> But I am not sure it will help much, we need to think to the problem we
+</I>&gt;<i> try to solve, and the way I see it, it is twofold :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> - we need to have a list of thing to update ( security or not, doesn't
+</I>&gt;<i> matter now )
+</I>&gt;<i> - we need a way to be aware of changes to the aformentioned list
+</I>
+Maybe there can be a trigger in bugzilla on all bugs that are newly
+targeted or retargeted at a stable release?
+
+&gt;<i> The solutions must :
+</I>&gt;<i> - be extensible with possibility of having a embargo in the future
+</I>
+AFAIK bugzilla supports access restrictions on individual bugs.
+
+&gt;<i> - be as automated as possible
+</I>&gt;<i> - be open to people that want to help
+</I>&gt;<i> - take in account that we will have more than 1 release, maybe more than
+</I>&gt;<i> 1 project
+</I>
+Products and releases are already supported in the current bugzilla
+configuration.
+
+
+ Christiaan
+</PRE>
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004937.html">[Mageia-dev] slight security improvement: should we update aria2 to 1.11.2?
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="004931.html">[Mageia-dev] Push request
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#4939">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#4939">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#4939">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#4939">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>