summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html77
1 files changed, 77 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..151526f60
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110414/003980.html
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Maintainers%20policy&In-Reply-To=%3C201104141641.31707.anaselli%40linux.it%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003976.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003975.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy</H1>
+ <B>Angelo Naselli</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Maintainers%20policy&In-Reply-To=%3C201104141641.31707.anaselli%40linux.it%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy">anaselli at linux.it
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Apr 14 16:41:28 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003976.html">[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003975.html">[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3980">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3980">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3980">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3980">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>&gt;<i> I don't think we should have a &quot;games&quot; group. It makes sense to have
+</I>&gt;<i> groups for packages that needs to be maintained together, for instance
+</I>&gt;<i> KDE apps and KDE libraries should be maintained by the same group of
+</I>&gt;<i> people. But for games, it is independent applications that could be
+</I>&gt;<i> maintained by different people, so I don't think all games should be
+</I>&gt;<i> maintained by the same group.
+</I>It was only an example, not a group suggestion ;)
+But another example could be kde-devel libs and other c-c++ devel libs
+(e.g. commoncpp2, ucommon, boost,...).
+Anyway i agree on the fact that game could not be useful :)
+
+Angelo
+
+-------------- next part --------------
+A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
+Name: not available
+Type: application/pgp-signature
+Size: 198 bytes
+Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
+URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-dev/attachments/20110414/a7d638e5/attachment.asc&gt;
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003976.html">[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003975.html">[Mageia-dev] Maintainers policy
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3980">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3980">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3980">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3980">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>