summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html209
1 files changed, 209 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7e39d0309
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110309/003150.html
@@ -0,0 +1,209 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] RPM5 AND MAGEIA
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RPM5%20AND%20MAGEIA&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTimSLMaW%3DwfxAg9fRK8-mcdTZs%2BsBP4r4zA-qUZc%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003140.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="003154.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] RPM5 AND MAGEIA</H1>
+ <B>Per &#216;yvind Karlsen</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20RPM5%20AND%20MAGEIA&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTimSLMaW%3DwfxAg9fRK8-mcdTZs%2BsBP4r4zA-qUZc%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] RPM5 AND MAGEIA">peroyvind at mandriva.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Mar 9 02:53:48 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003140.html">[Mageia-dev] RPM5 AND MAGEIA
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003154.html">[Mageia-dev] RFT: x11-server 1.10
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3150">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3150">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3150">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3150">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>2011/3/9 Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt;:
+&gt;<i> Le mardi 08 mars 2011 &#224; 23:59 +0100, Rapha&#235;l Jadot a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> The mails are hard to read, and long, and very technicals, &#160;but what
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> catched my eyes is some things like
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> &quot;level of compatibility&quot; between Mageia &amp; rpm5 is far greater than any
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> other (with
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> other rpm5 based distros being more compatible with Mageia than Mageia
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> is with non-rpm5 based distros as well&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So it doesn't mean we have to move to rpm5 for being compatible with
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> rpm5, so where is the problem ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So if there is no problem, why do people keep talking of this ?
+</I>I don't think this is what's been talked about by others at all previously,
+the question asked by others has usually been more about decissions
+concerning rpm(5), and the problem now coming from me asking for
+references to discussions mentioned, which obviously seems to be
+inappropriate.
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> So if Per Oyvind offers help, unless there are hidden things i do not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> understand, and if he can improve rpm.org or compatibility stuff or
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> whatever, why nobody says &quot;ok, why not, tell us, maybe you could help,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> maybe not&quot; Did not find it (at least in this ML)
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I personally answered at least on others mls :
+</I>&gt;<i> ( <A HREF="http://lists.mandriva.com/maintainers/2011-02/msg00080.php">http://lists.mandriva.com/maintainers/2011-02/msg00080.php</A> )
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I also answered to peroyvind on irc, but I will not disclose logs of
+</I>&gt;<i> private discussion.
+</I>Yeah, but for my activity on this list and on IRC, I haven't really actually
+been pushing much of any new and intrusive things of inconvenience,
+but rather trying to attempt offer help, suggestions, advice etc., or just
+answering and commenting on regular questions on topics actually
+being discussed already.
+Yet still being ignored, and when not the response is usually some paranoia
+about some spooky intentions where no matter how many times nor how
+hard I try keep making it clear and explain to dismiss, then just that part
+gets ignored with the FUD and personal attacks remaining the same..
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I said it to unity guy who asked on #mageia-dev ( maybe he didn't pay
+</I>&gt;<i> attention, or maybe he was not looking at the screen at this moment ).
+</I>Said what?
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> It was also explained during one of the first meeting for packagers who
+</I>&gt;<i> asked :
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-dev/2011/mageia-dev.2011-01-12-20.01.log.html#l-258">http://meetbot.mageia.org/mageia-dev/2011/mageia-dev.2011-01-12-20.01.log.html#l-258</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> So, for the n+1 time, we have no specific stuff to propose to
+</I>&gt;<i> collaborate nor ressources to allocate for the moment, because we are
+</I>&gt;<i> busy trying to have a infrastructure and a governance structure ready,
+</I>&gt;<i> and this take time. We even did a conference on FOSDEM to explain the
+</I>&gt;<i> whole process.
+</I>Hey, it's not like I'm necessarrily able to invest much time in it
+myself yet either,
+but that doesn't prevent things from being loosely discussed or just willing
+to receive input and communicate on what already exists and answer such simple
+questions as ~&quot;hey, do you guys have any interest in coordinating and sharing
+efforts at all? I'm all okay for trying to adapt and care for it, but
+let me at least
+know if I should bother..?&quot;, does it?
+
+I'm not pushing any great changes or trying to trick you into
+anything, most of it
+has been intended to actually help both yourself and us in saving time
+and avoiding
+unnecessary work without getting in the way for more important
+priorities, especially
+since it will get harder to start address later on if suddenly then
+you'd remotely
+express any possible interest in it only after a lot of stuff
+originally kept for compatibility
+only has been ripped out long time ago..
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If people want to do it fine, but without a clear proposal and people
+</I>&gt;<i> working on doing stuff, nothing will happen. And we clearly told we have
+</I>&gt;<i> more urgent things, like doing a first release, organizing, etc.
+</I>Yes, sure, that's kinda given and not really expected that people would be
+expected to want doing it and have interest in it.
+It's not like answering one out of a dozen simple questions asked would
+require to for you to stop everything else while a person answers it, or briefly
+discussing things superficially would put great strain on your project.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Seems it's not the first time, in this mail
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20110109/002024.html">https://www.mageia.org/pipermail/mageia-dev/20110109/002024.html</A>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> he told &#160;&quot;(if interested, I could help assist you on writing something
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> equivalent for compatibility wrapping similar to what I did in the
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> past with rpm4compat.h &amp; rpm46compat.h to make ie. URPM able to use
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> rpm 4.4 &amp; 4.6 api with rpm5, let's say rpm5compat.h or something).
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Whatever you end up doing, don't be afraid of asking or trying to
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> communicate on, the mutual benefits of collaboration are rather
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> obvious. &lt;;o)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> If not, sorry for imposing.&quot;
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> This mail had no answer, so what, is this guy a kind of antichrist of
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> rpm , talking with sugar words and trying to backstab you ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Using religious vocabulary and exaggeration is IMHO something you should
+</I>&gt;<i> avoid. It doesn't help.
+</I>Dude, you're being a bit overly sensitive here, it's not like these
+are expressions
+are considered as even uncommon nor very inappropriate to use to make points
+obvious and getting them across, if not exaggerating to make points, it would
+get very hard to miss them. And even if having issues with expressions used in
+the comparision, the point made wasn't less reasonable..
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> And at least, If the question are asked over and over, why is there so
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> few things in archives about it ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> I suspect that you do not correctly connect the dots.
+</I>No, in this specific case it was quite evident on what dots where that was
+being discussed. The thread and the questions asked was quite specific with
+something as trivial as asking for references to discussions referred to as
+having taken place several times before with responses and arrgumentation
+not being consistent with what you refer to.. :|
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> We have made quite clear in the roadmap, in our various communications,
+</I>&gt;<i> in this ml, and elsewhere that no disruptive changes are planned for the
+</I>&gt;<i> first release. This mean no systemd by default, no python change to
+</I>&gt;<i> python 3, likely no gnome shell by default, no lvm by default, no
+</I>&gt;<i> rolling release, etc, etc.
+</I>No issues with your roadmap whatsoever, only questions asked based
+on reasoning provided by others that doesn't seem entirely consistent
+with what's given for the roadmap..
+Not really my issue to begin with anyhow though, not concerning me anyways..
+
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And this also includes no disruptive changes in a area like the package
+</I>&gt;<i> manager if we can avoid it.
+</I>I think this has been well-established since long time ago, only one question
+recently from one person aboutit, with response and rationale given to
+being questioned.
+&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Sure every one knows mageia will not
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> hurry to go to rpm5 tomorrow, and so what ? If some are bored about
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> some related questions, why not opening a FAQ that explain it, or that
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> just point to the related archive/topic (which could be this one) ?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> That's not really a FAQ when there is at most 3 persons who asked for it
+</I>&gt;<i> ( 2 being part of the upstream project ).
+</I>I don't think I've really ever asked about this myself on this list,
+several other
+people not involved with upstream project at all has done on numerous
+occations earlier though.. ;)
+
+--
+Regards,
+Per &#216;yvind
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003140.html">[Mageia-dev] RPM5 AND MAGEIA
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="003154.html">[Mageia-dev] RFT: x11-server 1.10
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#3150">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#3150">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#3150">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#3150">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>